I've been using R.C. for about a year now and still find it fantastic and am looking forward to version3. I'm sure that some of what I going to suggest is too late for V3 but here goes.I'm not sure about the States but a typical European IFR clearance conversation would go like this.Aircraft, "Clearance Delivery this is (flt No.),(Aircraft type),Stand(parking pos.),with(ATIS ID),requesting clearance to(Destination)."Delivery,"(Flt No.) is cleared to destination via flight plan route, Climb initially (Ft. or F/L) squwak....,after departure contact (Facility)on (freq)"Normally you would also be told the SID to expect but the destination airport is not usually mentioned by delivery, I guess they assume you know where your going.When cleared to land the tower normally give a wind check,Tower"(Flt.No.)cleared to land, runway...,Wind...at.."Just a couple of things I miss in V2.2.Also by not having Clearance saying the destination airport the reply would flow much better i.e. all on one WAV file.

we'll see what we can do. we now have a british air traffic controller on board, so he is filling us in, on all the differences between US ATC, and UK ATC