wmayo44

A few folks have had trouble trying to play the MP4, so I've uploaded the .wmv version, which happens to be better anyway ... clearer especially.Movie link:http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/GEVflight.wmv

I'm thinking about getting the new hot Flight1 Cessna Mustang. It (and increasingly more new titles) requires SP2.I'm using Vista 32b just fine so far. For SP2 I've heard about runway problems, older aircraft not working at all, etc.But what I REALLY care about is that SP2 does NOT hurt or ruin TileProxy. Any experiences out there?I'm also nervous about the IDEAL of a clean install. I have so many aircraft and addons with keys, etc. I'm hesitant to start all over again. But TP and SP2 is what I'm interested in right now. Thanks.

Well, before the last update/upgrade, I had to stop sometimes and let it "catch up." The update has made it faster, now. Slow jet speeds work better, but you can forget real time Cessna Citation X!I use FRAPS, though 1st video was simply with a video camera (which other than artifacting, looks actually more real to me - with camera motion).

OMG - I did it again - misspelled the name! That's what I get for relying on my memory (age 55 now). Thanks for not frying me.I do love making the videos, though. I know it's been said before ... but FSX is now at such a new level. I'm so grateful for TP!

I did say VFR for scenery, but I had to be IFR rated to handle the cloud deck. So, sometimes it's fun to mingle with the clouds as well.v.8 TP.Near Jefferson, NC.http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/GEVthumb.jpgMovie link:http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/GEVflight.mp4For those who prefer YouTube but it will not be nearly as crisp and clear, and NOT in stereo sound.

It's a setting in nHancer graphic card utility. It's supposed to help keep areas behind plane from blurrying up too fast, but I can't tell much difference on mine right now (NVidia GeForce 9600GT).Here are a couple more pics...Nashville, TNhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Nashville01x.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Nashville04x.jpgMt. Adams in ORhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Adams02ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Adams04ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Adams05ax.jpgNear Knoxville, TNhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/TYS02ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/TYS03ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/TYS04ax.jpgAnd finally ...Ocala, FLhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala01a.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala02ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala03a.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala04ax.jpg

Blurry may be due to flying too fast for TP to "catch up," at least for the computer you're using. I say maybe, because I'm not sure.Graining may be because of your card. I have discovered that if I don't do the LOD "clamp" ... my textures are quite grainy.

The board killed the uploads, but it seems to allow remote linking, so ... if that is allowed (using link to my server):http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific01ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific02ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific03ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific04ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific06ax.jpgPlus one over Tallahassee, FLhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/TLHax.jpg and one over my home town area (Roanoke/Salem, VA) in Premier 1 jethttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/ROAtoGSO01a.jpg finally, over Ocala, FLhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala01a.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Ocala03a.jpg

Okay ... since the board killed the pics, you can view them here...http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific01ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific02ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific03ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific04ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific05ax.jpghttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Pacific06ax.jpgPlus one over Tallahassee, FLhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/TLHax.jpg

Well, I used fraps on all buthttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/flight3a.wmvThat one, I used an actual video camera, shooting the screen. The bad and good, is ... that I got some artifacts, but I also get a realistic "camera" moving effect, like it was really shot with a video camera.Yes, FRAPS is a hog - you can barely get by with it with a QUAD-CORE if you use FSX. (You can see SOME stutters, if you look close at my videos).Oh ... and Christian, sorry ... I think I misspelled your last name in the videos.

At the following links (on my site)...http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/flight3a.wmvhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/flight4.wmvhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Premier1.wmvhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/float01.wmvhttp://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/GC01.wmvThe last one is in the Grand Canyon. Stunning scenery!I can't say enough, how TP has revolutionized FS flying.

So much eye candy ... so little time!Plus one shot over Cumming, GA - a busy intersection!

I love this VLJ (this one by Eaglesoft, though discontinued).TP continues to make FS a whole new experience. We can't thank you enough.Link for viewing clip:http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/Premier1.wmvWhadda y'all think?

This flight I did actually a earlier than my last video posted. But this one is a jet flight - with TP!http://www.weatherroanoke.com/wm/flight3a.wmvThis was with a video cam, before I got FRAPS. The only advantage to the video cam is that it really has a moving feel like a real cam would.

Sure. No problem. You are so open and giving in this project, I certainly can do no less. (In other words, it's a pleasure).You should see the quality of the original AVI file. It's amazing how much detail there can be.