Riah069

I AGREE with you on skypark. Lots of promises no deliveies.

Yeah it is LOL

O prefer to watch these forums, as to watching Days of our Lives. TBH i don't know which is more entertaining.

Simply AMAZING. These developers rock on. A pillar of the MSFS. As a side note it makes me laugh if i look at the pricing of another developer which i will not name and another platform which wont be named.

Have a good one 🙂

Regards

I have never reinstalled Windows with a CPU upgrade. I will reinstall if i upgrade my motherboard.

So in VR it is fine? Seems they stuffed up the FOV in regards to non VR users then 😞

Does anyone feel the zoom aspect in the Transall cockpit is crazy zoomed out by default? I find the problem is when i zoom in to correct the crazy FOV it does not feel right and it over zooms.

Ideas appreciated on this 🙂

I just unpacked mine. and i have watched a few Youtubes about it. Problem i am having is that in MSFS it does not shoe Velocity one Yoke in the title bar in Control setup. It actually shows it as 3 Axis 20 Buttons plus Hat for both devices.

I have updated the firmware to 1.4.0. It is set to PC.

Is there something i am missing here? Because all the videos i have watched labels the devices as VelocityOne Flight.

Regards

I do own there V1.0 if you call it that. And yes the discount is there for me. Just querying why the $8.00 to goto V2.0. I would understand if the airport was completely stripped and all new assets etc where used.

I maybe missing something here. But are we now buying updates? Reading through what was done it doesn't make sense. You goto other parties like inibuilds etc and you don't see them asking for money because they added a building or retextured the aprons. I maybe wrong. And generally i am 🙂

And so begins the "days of our lives". Queue music.

To add about this plane. Price Wonderful lack of manual yeah theres that. And some other things. TBH i really dont give a word not allowed, its a good plane with bells and whistles and should mature with patches of which i am sure will come about. Jeez have you seen the garbage that is bloating the market place and 3rd party sellers lately? And the prices being asked? LMAO. People need to take a back seat have a beer pop a pill and calm down. That is all.

Kathleen Kennedy reach is massive. Everything she touches turns to Do-Do

I'm amazed it came with a cockpit LOL

Yes on there 0.95 revision 2 experimental, I am getting very good fps. With all screens on and taxi/flying. Did a small hop from LOWS to LOWI and it was a really good flight. System spec depending.

Ok MSFS version, all difficulties on. And it seems it is ONLY engine one that has an issue at all with realistic settings on. So i was using Skypark doing a Hop 5 mission. Landed at the airport, did a after landing check list, turned around lined up started the wet takeoff and immediately engine goes into a tissy and then eventually dies. Have i seriously got to goto cold and dark after EVERY landing in order for Engine one not to die on me?

I would like to copy the GTN from the retrofit to another livery in the DC-3 family of liveries. Is there an easy way to do this?

Regards

Well this is weird i dont have the Cessna Citation Longitude in my library. And i have the version of MSFS that comes with all that.

I have a Tobii 5 and i like it. But this has come up and i'm gonna grab it to see what its like. https://www.trackhat.org/sensorv2

Well tbh i'm not having any of the issues described. FPS is good, Sounds are fine. Now admittedly i did a fresh install yesterday before SU11 dropped. I have DLSS Quality running and Terrain LOD set to 100.  

Ahhh Dream scenery it wouldn't be be the the same without your input EVERY update.... Gits....

Common sense stuff would be that they should have made a BETTER connector. Pure and simple. In all my years this has never been an issue until now. Its on you Nvidia.

Love all these 4090 videos with a default cessna or something. Never in cockpit and NEVER showing a high fidelity plane at a big airport with loads of traffic. Just beggars belief.

Yeah i dont use ground aircraft slider at all, taxes my system. And tbh i have not seen any generics, and as long as i see traffic moving about i'm all good 🙂

Well my experience is to do the manager/controller get my airlines/flight plans and then not run anything just use live traffic in the sim. I see plenty of ai with correct liveries so i am happy.

Fair points. But I'm just calling it as i see it as a consumer. Nothing more. Its just the constant digs at ASOBO when ever a statement is posted. And as you said they decided to stick with and continue to use C++ in there aircraft and hence the issues that they are facing. TBH if they worked ground up with not using C++ then yes we properly wouldn't have the 737 atm. But maybe in the long run it might have worked out better. I'm no programmer don't claim to be, I'm a simple man. But at any rate i own the 737 i like the plane. I dont see myself buying any other iteration of the airframe besides the 700. So i wish them the best.

I find it amusing that nearly all posts from PMDG throws a ASOBO kick in. Oh we cant do this or its difficult because we don't have this and ASOBO needs to make this in order for this to work. TBH its getting quite tiresome. From where i see other developers aren't having half the problems PMDG seem to have. Fenix has released what 3-5 Big patches? They don't seem to have issues. Maybe and i am guessing here that if PMDG wasn't being lazy (Porting old Code. Round peg in square hole?) and made the 737 from scratch to work in the MSFS environment from the get go the might have had a better compatible plane. But that is my humble opinion. I think Fenix is a good standard to which other developers should come to. Great communication, Good pricing, and a overall good product. Hats off to those guys.