dave600

thankyou that worked also removed the null entry which fixed my deadzone. much better.Dave.

is that for windows 7 as that root doesnt exsist?sorry should have said and cheers for the fast reply thoughDave.

where is the file location to adjust the trim repeater?also with my joystick i seam to have a fairly big deadzone could that be adjusted?thanksDave.

sorry sir

flight can be whatever microsoft want it to be thats one good thing about flight its open, maybe not to 3rd party but its open to microsoft,gaming side dont take off release and update the simulator side to cater to the simmers, with a dvd game once gold thats it apart from patches with this its an on going development. maybe for the long run will be what we want it to be but until then who knows

you need to show your mate some respect

I have yoke,pedels, track ir, iPad2 as radio stack etc etc etc been a flightsim fan since fs95, and yes Al I fly gliders, but fsx gives me what I dream of and that's flyin ga aircraft that's out of my finances in real life.Graphics do play a huge part to the immersion factor and with the likes of orbx we get all the eye candy, but what developers can't do is what they want to when it comes down to flight models and the weather systems that's limited to code deep inside fsx that developers can't chance, the likes of real air and A2A do amazing work but they even say in manuals "limitation of fsx code" that's what I'd like to see opened up in flight,Just a discussion not asking for heated comments ;)RegardsDace.

I myself a glider pilot irl, so these things do matter to us. :)The sim does not need to be a top range million pound simulator to model basic physics, try condor for a flight model, a cheap small time gliding sim which destroys fsx in that department, also please read what I put, addon companies can only do so much within the limitations of fsx itself, that's what I'm hoping gets addressed in flight along with most real life pilots that sim. Were part of the many types of people who enjoy siming.RegardsDave.

Hi all, been a reader and flight simmer for years but never posted so hi all.After reading every post all people seam to care about is the graphics of the sim? "Looks like fsx nothing more than fsx sp3 " etc etc.What about the important things that matter the most, I.e flight model?? Weather systems ( ridge lift, thermals, wave, turbulence etc) all these things are what matter to the way the aircraft reacts when flying, fsx is ok but the flight model especially the rudder which is not modelled correctly at all needs updating, ground friction needs to be modelled correctly I could go on,Maybe flight looks like fsx because this time around and hopefully they are concentrating on the things we can't see in screenshots? Personally I don't mind if flight looks like fsx as long as bugs are fixed and the most important things are modelled correctly that really matter, I solely fly ga aircraft for the scenery which add ons provide but what they can't do is correct the errors in the flight models and weather that lie deep inside the fsx code just work around it the best they can.Just thought I'd put this out there for all to read.RegardsDavid.

well iv bought it and have just been looking around in the cub and i have to say this is good, i took off from the dock at Petersburg and followed the river and found a nice lake which had a dock to land at with logs in the water, was a nice little flight :) going to enjoy finding these cabins :( as for the flight you suggest thats next on the flight plan thanks.RegardsDave.

Thank you for your fast replys.looks like ill be getting tongrass fjords x tonight.is there a flight anyone can say i should do for a first flight in the dodosim 206?Many thanks for the replys guys.Regards Dave.

hi all,ok my first post after years of reading :( im stuck on which would be best to buy out of these 2 scenerys,the first 1 is Tongrass fjords xhttp://www.avsim.com/pages/0909/FSAddon/TongassX.htmthe 2nd is Papua New Guinea scenery by pacific islands simulations http://www.avsim.com/pages/0609/PNG/Bushpilot.htmOk so their the 2 im stuck on, now about what type of flying i like to do and in which aircraft,I only fly GA aircraft, A2A cub/p47, Realair Duke 600, Dodosims 206, L-39, and a few others but they are the main ones, i much prefer flying in mountain areas landing in small bush strips, taking supplys in etc. Both packages seam to give me what i want for my money, Tongrass looks more professional better models etc but PNG looks more like it has the airfields and approches im after,both have wildlife which is a plus. i like seaplanes and small helipads,so i put it to you guys here to spend my money so be nice :( ok my specs are;amd 6000+ 64bit duel core 3.1 gig6 gb ramnvidia gts250 1 gig cardhow will they run? what i dont want is to have to scale back what i buy to get fps back and lose the effects iv bought, png seams to run well on fps, tongrass i dont no? which will have a longer life and have the most fun in?in the end which is the best 1?RegardsDave.