RobertDennard

I was one who purchased the eye candy. Generally i am happy with my CS purchases (767-300, 200, 737-100) there are some issues with the -100. To be true to life the -100 models had the rear boarding door with built in stairs. This door was larger than the other doors and rotated downward and the stairs folded out as shown in this diagram http://www.flickr.co...157624545005667 these stairs were standard on the -100 and optional on the -200 as seen in this image http://en.wikipedia....lines_Combi.JPG. The outboard wing landing lights should extend from the flap canoes but are fixed in place. Additionally with the CS 737-100 the right outboard slats for some reason do not extend will take a closer look later.And finally at cruise altitude of 31000 feet, the fuel flow is 5.0-5.5 per engine thats 10,000-11,000 lbs of fuel per hour..... flew from yellowknife canada to Resolute bay and landed with 430 lbs of fuel. definately an issue there. should be more around max 6000 lbs per hour. On the up side of this model it is absolutely detailed the windows are all transparent with passengers in the cabin. Escape slides and overwing window emergency exits open (great for those fs passengers emergency landings) As far as frame rates? This model provides the aboslute Best framerates of any aircraft i have in my entire collection. I have an old machine, Win XP single core 2.4 ghz processor with 3.5 g of ram, and a cheap graphics card and i still get 5-10 frames per second BETTER than any other aircraft i have in my system. but yes there are a few bugs that need to be worked out. Also if you look at the engine nacelles as you get to higher N1 settings you will notice the air inlets open up. just lots of little surprises.