edpatino

18 minutes ago, arwasairl said:

I think you're talking about the pms50 GTN which is more of an emulation but not a true simulation.

The TDS GTNXi uses the trainers, as said on the manual: https://www.tdssim.com/Downloads/Manuals/TDSGTNXiFlightSimManual.pdf (Page 7)

I do.

The PMS50 GTN is very good, not sure if you've tried it.

2 hours ago, arwasairl said:

Same as how RealityXP or Flight1 updates their NavDB, they use Garmin trainers which require different datasets than what Navigraph supplies.

Navigraph won't be supporting the Garmin trainers AFAIK, so atm you're going to have to stick with the 2004 database it comes with or upgrade it.

The GTN's for MSFS don't use the Garmin Trainers anymore.

Looks like it won't be integrated in the aircraft cockpit, but running in an independent 2D window. I'm maybe wrong, but this would be a step back for me.

Happy new year to all members and the staff of AVSIM. Even if there's much discussion about being now the start of a new decade or not, 2020 marks the beginning of a year that promises a lot of changes to our hobby.

Good health to everybody!.

Cheers, Ed

5 minutes ago, CapnOz said:

Hvae you had any issues with it? What about the NAV profile, Ed?

Still on my wishlist, but not for long!.

Cheers, Ed

A great aircraft for Christmas time!.

Cheers, Ed

A must have for serious Aerofly FS 2 flight simmers. It has brought life to our previously silent and lonely flights.

Thanks to Karl for this release.

Cheers, Ed

Excellent model from Carenado, as always. Hopefully the systems are modeled well, let's say "average" and not too many bugs are present in the initial release v1.0.

Another area of improvement is on the commercial side. Being this a continuation of the ATR saga, one would expect that previous buyers of the ATR42 were entitled to a discount by buying the ATR72, but it seems that it's not the case here.

Anyway, another Carenado turboprop to add to the collection.

Cheers, Ed

Not mentioned, but probably the main feature of the release is its compatibility with P3Dv3 and v4, apart for still being compatible with FSX and FSX:SE, not for FS9.

Cheers, Ed

5 hours ago, Gabe777 said:

And, anyway, the Leonardo version is in a different class. And, they updated their Maddog for 64 bit release, as opposed to porting over a 10 -year old model.

Couldn't agree more!. I really think the Coolsky product is only interesting to DC-9 lovers.

To complicate matters, after installing the new DC-9 gauge that Coolsky released today for testing, finally got the splash screen and the aircraft menu working as it should... but, when selecting the first checklist, inmediately got a CTD.

My initial thought is that this product will need a complete checkup and verification by Coolsky before it's final. Regretfully, I've already paid for it, but given F1 refund's policy, it's always a possibility.

Does anybody know if these planes would work with P3Dv4.3 Academic or Pro and Windows 10?.

It seems that users with Windows 7 are still unable to fly these aircraft. Surprisingly during the beta test period they did not notice this big and annoying issue.

It seems that it's an issue with some gauges that don't load properly in all three aircraft.

I fully agree. I've bought it but decided to uninstall it completely until a complete solution is found. Better is to hold on.

Cheers, Ed

Excellent update. With all that new aircraft functionality and the further improvements on its already top-notch performance, Aerofly FS2 is gettting even better.

Cheers, Ed

In principle, very good addon that I like a lot, but the fact that it uses the couatl engine really keeps me away of using it on my current P3Dv4.2 setup. I would suggest FSDT trying to change that engine to something more robust and lest prone to different kind of errors.

Cheers, Ed