Jump to content

nomad71

Members
  • Content Count

    40
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nomad71


  1. 1 hour ago, ConairMSFS said:

    Hy guys. I'm reading all the discussions about FsHud, but it's better to directly ask you some questions.

    Do I need to use FSTL or AIG for traffic with fshud, or it injects traffic by itself too?

    Does it manages "pushback facing north, south" etc when clearing for pushback?

    What about arrival/departing runways for traffic too? Or there's still the risk of of landing/departing in opposite direction of AI traffic?

    I'm tempted to buy it, but first I'd like to clarify my doubts. Thanks.

     

    1- Your choice.  It can use the default traffic BGL's but in my case I use AIG

    2- Not at this time.   It just clears you for pushback and you have to know which way you need to be facing.

    3- I have not had issues with AI traffic coming in the opposite direction as FSHud controls it.  It works great for me. 


  2. 14 hours ago, TomCYYZ said:

    I asked this earlier on in the thread. I use AIG Traffic... I just purchased FSHUD and I'm not sure whether I need to run the AIG Traffic Controller or not? Also, in settings do the Traffic Source: BGL   AIG  External boxes have to be checked?

    You do not start the Traffic Controller and only the AIG box has to be checked in this case.


  3. Agree.  It's a great software.  To be able to use these scenarios you have to have the Advanced Edition.  Well worth it.   Constantly updated and also now they added flows for a virtual co-pilot.    

    EDIT:  Also to download the scenarios from the app you have to have the airplane selected that supports scenarios.  For example Fenix.  Then you will be able to download the scenario file plus a weather preset file for that plane.  One thing I noticed is that after downloading the weather preset you have to restart MSFS to be able to use it.   

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 1

  4. On 7/14/2022 at 7:54 AM, nomad71 said:

    I used PATC for several years.  One thing I never liked is the lack of engagement of the developer with the community and the fact that he releases an update once year or less frequently.  I would like to understand what will be his commitment going forward specially with a dynamic platform like MSFS.

    @alpha117 you seem to work closely with the developer.  Can you share his expected commitment to support a dynamic platform like MSFS? vs a once a year update that we saw in P3D (actually the last update was in April 2021).  This will better inform potential buyers.  


  5. I used PATC for several years.  One thing I never liked is the lack of engagement of the developer with the community and the fact that he releases an update once year or less frequently.  I would like to understand what will be his commitment going forward specially with a dynamic platform like MSFS.


  6. I looked into the binding last night and the default binding for engines 1 and 2 switches are also assigned to other commands (like opening fuel valves etc) that I eliminated.  So I created a profile for the fenix and removed those.   Now I can use the full quadrant again.  😀

    Again I recommend you watch the video I referenced above.  It helped a lot.  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...