Jump to content

hugopiugo

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Reputation

1 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

760 profile views
  1. well, if it's better, but will make almost no difference in FPS, then I'm going to save my 100 bucks. what about the difference from i5 to i7? Won't it make a considerable difference?
  2. Hi, I have an MSI GE62-6QE: Intel i5 Quadcore 2.3Ghz - 3.2Ghz (6300HQ) / NVIDIA GTX 965M 2GB GDDR5 / 8GB RAM DDR4 / 1 TB HDD Now I have a chance to pay more 100€ and get this HP: Intel I7 Quadcore 2.6Ghz - 3.5Ghz (6700HQ) / NVIDIA GTX 950M 4GB DDR3 / 8GB RAM DDR3L (which I don't know what's the difference) / 128 GB SDD and 1TB HDD Basically, everything seems better, except for the GPU. For Prepar3D, will the HP have better performance than the MSI, being that it has a lower GPU but higher CPU? (I'm also a little concerned about the brands, HP vs MSI in "gaming" (I know it's not gaming but you unterstand))
  3. Thank you for all your replies. Yes it's a gaming laptop, has a button that makes the fan's make a lot of noise and running almost like it's a desktop. Well I've tried it... and without add-ons it's awesome (obviously), but as soons as I do 737PMDG it drops. With a simple 1 runway scenery and 737 the fps are around 15 fps. For me, the airbus it's less heavier then the 737. I believe the laptop isn't enabling the turbo, it's running at 2.3ghz, and I see the CPU it's running 99%. So basically, I can't fly with this framerate, it's not stable, it goes to 25 and then drops, etc. If I was able to enable the turbo, it would get MUCH better, but unfortunately I can't. Well, I have a question, FSX is old school and runs more on CPU, what about P3D? Didn't they fix a little bit more that part?
  4. It'll run... that means 10 fps, or it's 'playable'?
  5. Hi, I'm getting a laptop with the Intel i5-6300HQ Quad Core 2.3ghz (THE GPU IS NVIDIA GTX 965M 2GB), and I'd like to know about the processor, since the GPU is relatively good. Is it enough for a normal FSX experience? (Add-on airplanes, and sceneries) First I want to know with 2.3ghz... At the specification it says it has a turbo 3.2ghz, but I heard someone saying you can't enable it...
  6. Hi, I want to buy a laptop (yes I know, is 3 times better to buy a desktop, but in this situation it needs to be a laptop). In my mind, there are 3 laptops. One has NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M 4GH DDR3, the other has NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 2GB GDDR5, and the last one NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 2GB GDDR5, obviously all with a different prices. All are Intel I5-6300HQ Quad Core 2.3Ghz - 3.2Ghz Will the NVidia's affect the performance of FSX in a way that compensates the difference of the price which is 100€ each (from 950 to 960, and from 960 to 965). Or does FSX focus more on CPU? What about P3D? I really need some help in this situation so I thank you in advance.
  7. Hey, So I've been having this weird issue and I don't know how to fix it. This is how it looks when close to the polygon: But when I move away: Do you see that "line" between the polygons? How do I created the polygon? 4 planes detached from each other, and then UVWunrap, using this method:http://www.fsdeveloper.com/wiki/ind...:_How_to_eliminate_lines_between_each_polygon I have tried with and without MipMaps. Here's another example of the line:
×
×
  • Create New...