Sebjo89

Haha, thats true!

Hi. Just some thoughts. A lot of people usually watch other simmers fly these days via twitch or youtube. Would'nt it be even better if some of those people watching become a part of the simmers world, for example, someone could handle the pushback truck and get the airplane where the captain wants it. Someone could handle the fuel truck, and others the cargo and baggages. I know how it might sound. Why make addons for controlling such things when the simulator is for "flying"? But I feel that if this would be implemented it would help the "simulation" part become more immersive and real. The communication between the captain and ground crew would make it just like in the real world. Just like PilotEdge makes it possible with "real" ATC. What are your thoughts?

We're getting there! I get 50-60fps stable with ALL sliders to MAX, except HDR+SSAO and anti-aliasing to NONE but in NVIDIA settings with anti-aliasing on x16, 3840x2160 with a GTX 1070. Outside cockpit 90+fps, inside 55-60fps stable.

I actually have the image that you referring to. That one which Andrey said took 45min to render(load).

Saw this, not exactly clear what year/date this was discussed but apparently the guys from TrueSky was interested in integrating TrueSky in XP- 11. Unfortunately(or maybe good) DTG came first. https://www.tapatalk.com/topic/21580-x-plane-flight-simulator/110854-trusky-is-happy-to-support-a-volumetric-clouds-project-for-xp11

We can discuss statistics and graphs all we want. But one thing is for sure. Everyone looking at X-plane 11 wishes they could have a PMDG airliner add-on with it and I can guarantee that when (or if) this happens that statistics will change...

Now that we see what DTG has pushed into their flight simulator engine (TrueSky), I'm just wondering if the X-plane engine has that option. For example, this from UNIGINE, which looks promising and realistic. Could this be possible to get into X-plane? Cheers Sebastian

Hi Does anyone have knowledge about a developing ARN(ESSA) airport scenery? I know about the SWEDFLIGHT Pro, but I think its a bit out of date, in regards of the graphics etc. Second question. Does someone know if converting the ESSA scenery "*RBX" works good, and if so, does it need a lot of fixes? / Sebastian

Could this genius which made this pushback make a complete groundhandling package please ;). It would be in good hands.

I am one of the beta tester. I can tell you, it sounds amazing! Immersive is one word among more.

Its freeware....

Aha, then we hope it gets fixed soon then. Thats a good part with LR, is the constant updating.

This is a pilot who compares the two sims. I think he talks about ground physics and how X-plane is more like in real life then the other sim. Judge by yourself.

I think this RSR qoute only is a issue mainly for the 747. As you can hear him talk regarding x-plane it sounds like it's plausible that we will see at least 737nxg for xp.

I would like to add that all people which have invested in P3D shouldn't have any reason abandoing it. It's there choice and I would also stick with p3D if I had invested in it. So.. maybe the question remains for the new people which is about to buy a simulator.

Or maybe they both are good for what they are. Maybe people who thinks the other sims looks bad just expresses a feeling, rather then looking at something from a developers view who know what it takes to create a sim with the current hardware and graphics engines. I like both sims for what they are. The only thing is the spending of addons that is scratching my head. Could also be a dedication thing that a dont see.

I respect you part, but I can't figure out why people want to spend 100+ dollars on making p3D look better when they apparently can get good visuals with default xp or with Ortho4xp? I am just asking, not doing p3D vs xp talk, just a question. I do like P3D but I don't pay 60 dollars + 70 dollars for orbx vector and global base pack. Would be lovely to know och maybe convince other wise. :) Cheers

Thanks Robert. My I ask if the triple 7 as the same issues or are you waiting after 747 releases, because of priorities?

The sound. The flightdeck. The rain effect. Lovely.

Aha, I see. :) Sorry.

soon... http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2F121624-a320-ultimate-from-flightfactor%2F

Yes, I could easily do that but it will not be "put the cards on the table" dialog, rather a cryptic answer. Hehe There are topics on PMDG General already questioning this, but far as I know the PMGD staffs integrity is huge. Nothing negative about that. What we know is that it are just restless customers who love their products and who want their product specifically for Xplane. And that should not be anything negative either.

As much I respect what you are saying and I feel that we actually need more diplomatic and calmer topic and forum writing, I must add one last question about XP, if I can? If I start a topic over at XP forum and ask the following question, "Will there be more PMDG aircraft other than DC6 in XP?" the answer will directly be diverted and not straight forward answered. Maybe it's because you guys are actually are developing more PMDG aircrafts for XP or the opposite. I don't know. But what I trying to say is. This question will come more and more, and much more now that your topic is about P3D and the less then 2 days official release of DTG. We all are eager to know. Because we love your products. Simple as that. :) __________ Sebastian Björk - Stockholm, Sweden

Let me hear it. Will XP 11 get PMDG's well-made and wonderful aircrafts?