egontester

How did can say that "most of the users don't have this problem"? Look to the many comments over the years and you mast conclude that many users have this problem, many saying that they will not use XP12 and go to MSFS. It is silly by LR that they do not accept these comments and will loose many customers. They could put options in settings for "happy users" ( that is you ) and for users looking for a usefull simulator that's me and many others...

I did not say that shadeX can solve the problem completel but there is at least an improvement to allow useage of Xplane 12. LR seems to have only one light source (i.e. the sun) implemented and therefore strong difference between inside and outside; a more reasonable approach could be implementation of "invisible" lights in the cabin. If these are not strong the effect of "moving shadows" would remain.

I am astonished that so many people discuss about cockpit brightness sometimes even insulting others.- As previous leader for the UX - team in a companie building commercial simulators for military and others i would have been fired immediately if providing such view of cockpits. A simulator must allow quick and easy reading of cockpit instruments and this is by Xplane 12 in its present version clearly not fullfilled. The arguments about "realism" for such a simulator are nonsens simply said; even LR uses them either by not knowing mandatory requirements for a simulator or not being able to improve it! By the way: the add-on Reshade is able to make cockpit brightness useable.