Jump to content

AndyEG

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    16

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AndyEG

  1. Posted

    On 11/1/2023 at 11:09 PM, Rogen said:

    There are a few DUMPBIN style apps you could search for, the one I use is named as WUMPBIN and is available from the link below.

    http://www.benf.org/other/wumpbin/index.html

    Extract both dll and exe to a folder named WUMPBIN and run by double clicking the exe,  WUMPBIN provides a GUI display as shown below where the example 32 bit exe has the large address aware flag set.

     

    ....this sound of the lack-of-memory-problem is annoying.

    I'll try, what you recommended. Created a folder named wumpbin and extracted the two elements.

    There is no exe that opens. Only an empty folder. I'm an absolute beginner in such tricky affairs...😒

  3. Posted

    1 hour ago, Rogen said:

    Sorry, not sure what you're talking about ??

    I suggest if needing to take "out of memory" questions further, jump on over to the FSX|FSX-SE forum.

     

    1.) I was talking about the 4 GB Patch for fs 09 - and got it in this way, this patch could be used also in fsx. This MS-Command-line-tool - puhhh....that's a little too much "IT" for me. But thank you anyway. I'll remember that.

    2.) Done. 🥱🥱

  6. Posted

    Good evening,

    these two airports are installed on my fsx. Developer is Aerosoft - and only these two airports cause the lack of memory announcing while final approaching.

    FSX SP 2 is installed.

    Other Airports - such as Munich etc. - work properly, even with demanding environment such as VFR Germany, without this lack of memory problem, also with highly detailed aircraft,

    for example Aerosoft's Airbus A 320.

    Any ideas for remedy?

    Thanks in advance.

    Andy

  7. Posted · Edited by Ray Proudfoot
    Quoted post removed.

    @Rogen,

    ...sorry for fullqoute - the 4 GB Patch - usable in fs 09 - also works with FSX? "Low-level - high risk situation"..... :ohmy: About MSFS - I knew about the farily considerable hardware and the high-level-internet speed for streaming.

    I read about problems, if the MS-Server is down while maitenance working... - therefore I'll pass on that....  - cause I use WLAN.... .

    Cheers back.... .

  9. Posted

    12 hours ago, SteveFx said:

    if you want to fly with the combination of

    1) complex detailed aircraft model

    2) very detailed airport

    then you need to make some compromises with the fsx sliders, dialling down ai traffic and ground traffic to a few percent and setting lod range to default perhaps.  When you find something that works then try moving them up a little at a time.

     

    ...hi Steve - I feared this exactly. Highly detailed aircraft cause the same problems (particularly the lack of memory) in fs09 - for example the cls-airbusses (A 330 etc. freeware by sim-market).

    Funny detail on the brink: Using - also a product distributed by aerosoft - the HUEY X I enjoy to "explore" these airports and the surroundings, without any "memory-problems".

    12 hours ago, SteveFx said:

    in choosing Heathrow X you have probably chosen the absolute worst case of the latter.  London is a large city surrounded by many airports and thus some care is needed.

    Try reading  some of the reviews for Heathrow X on sim market, you are not alone in having this issue and there is no great solution 

    Heathrow X - also edited by Aerosoft - is - like some other airports of this company useable in fsx and fs09 - one of the "problem-childs". One of many problems - using this airport on fs09 - is, that airplanes of "my traffic" (you know this, i'll be sure) are standing beneath the surface on their parking-positions.

    I deinstalled it on fs09 and chose an other product of a well known english/british simulation company - named Just Flight. They offer a nice support - very commendable.

    A 320 Professional was my first liner..  - but I don't want to bore you with this. :wink:

    Dublin X also is a very highly detailed airport. The aerosoft A-320 planes are also very highly detailed.

    Also to you - many, many thanks for previous support.

  11. Posted

    Good Morning to all who want's to read this.... .

    The annoying lack-of-memory prompt always appears (although enough memory is set with DX 10 Fixer) - at this time at a flight from EDDL to EIDW. Exactly one minute or so approaching RWY 28 the also annoying MS-Warning-Sound .. - *arrgh*. 😡

    Perhaps an interesting detail: Mouseclicks at the display make the announcements disappear - the simulation is able to be completed.

    But then the usual, also annoying MS-announcment pops, that Flight-Simulator is stopped and the problem is to be transmitted to MS.

    I cancel this any time. Any brillant or less brillant ideas to solve this - annoying - problem? 🤔

  12. Posted

    Hm. In these Aerosoft Aircraft - issued first in 2015 - your tool generates nice "moving" shadows depending incidence of light within the cockpit. You may know, flightsimulation is my "insane" hobby since '98, as I had the nice experience to stay in the cockpit of an A 320 by flight from EGLL (visiting Night of the Proms in Hyde Park) to EDDL. There was a stormy and rainy approach, I remember that exactly.

    But the fsx - sorry for swearing, cursing about.... . I "drive" the fs09 also... .

    Now this is the third "machine" I built to simulate. Well - I will disable the ground shadows at first and see what happens. 2048x2048 textures I will even try.

    Only this problem with lack of memory warning - in the meantime without CTD but grey surface textures with the buildings of EGLL (Heathrow X) appear - is existing still.

    Truly yours to Greenwich or elsewhere.... . 🙂

     

  14. Posted

    Oh - a lot of thanks for this quick reply - just a few informations about my OS:

    Win 11 Pro 64 bit, HIGHMEMFIX is set by your product - there is one warning I couldn't understand:

    "HINT! TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD IS 1024 or less. When using payware aircraft (PMDG A 2 A etc.) this setting may be too low.."

    The Aerosoft Airbus is one of those payware aircraft. What's about this?

    Then three more warnings about shadows: "Self shadow of aircraft is set." "Aircraft force shadow is set" and "ground shadow is enabled in fsx."

    Should I enable all settings?

    About OOM Memory - I ask google for more... -

  15. Posted

    Hello to the community,

    I'm flightsimmer since 1998 - but no nerd. I've just a known problem of simmers, using fs09/fsx at win 10/11 - the "lack of memory-problem" - although

    I bought and installed the DX 10-Controller.

    Thanks in advance for tips, I have created a new post to the topic.

    Yours truly

    Andreas

  16. Posted · Edited by charliearon
    edit out attempted swear!

    Dear Sirs, hello to the community,

    'cause there are no faq - I describe my problem very briefly:

    Using the FSX SP 2 with some Landscape-AddOns, Airports and - pretty new - the highliy detailed Aerosoft Airbus A 320 - I bought the DX 10 Controller by Steve.

    Nice tool with shadows and so on - until the  FSX with the problem listed above. I read, that DX 10 Controller would solve this problem - but unfortunately it does'nt.

    The same problem exists on the "ancient" fs 09 - but there is a tool named "4 GB-Patch" - it is working.

    Thanks for - helpful - tips.

    Andy

×
×
  • Create New...