Happily, FS2002 allows for much higher resolutions than FLYII's maximum of 1024*768. While FLYII has a nice crispness around it's cockpit outlines, the (FLY) instruments never look as good on my 22" monitor, as MSFS at 1600*1200*32.Performance wise, MSFS & FLYII have been about the same on my year old system. X-Plane has the smoother running instrumentation of the bunch.L.AdamsonAthlon 1900XPGeforce3Ti500

WOW! This looks great!!Keep up the good work guys! I'm really looking forward to this! :)I have one little question.. will there be a "Active Virtual Cockpit" like the 737NG from WilcoPub and their comming A320?If you guys need a beta tester i'm here :) hehe

If you are wondering about availability of "quality" a/c and panels, then some MSFS add-ons are for you.Check out Wilco's P.I.C B767- nothing in FLY! will come close to the full functionality of the panel systems, esp. the FMC!Also Phoenix Simulations-UK have wonderfull choices such as the Airbus 320, and my favourite, the new Dash-8. I used to lean heavily towards FLY!, but the quality add-ons for FS won me over. I still use the PMDG B777 in FLY though, out of loyalty...Eytan

Hi Lefteris,Looks great, certainly "drool material" :)Do you guys have a tentative release date yet?Thanks,Bruce.

There is no words for many pictures but an exception can always be madeGREAT BALLS OF FIRE, THIS LOOKS GREATMikePolarairways the way to fly.polarairways.comThe independant VA from HOLLANDHUBS in Amsterdam (EHAM), Boston(KBOS) and Singapore (WSSS)

Scrolling panels were tough to get used to when Fly! first came out, but I soon got to like them...if you're making the transition to MSFS2K2, do yourself a favor and invest in a VERY good monitor. As Mr. Adamson pointed out, you need the mega-pixel capacity of an 18" or larger screen to be able to comfortably use the compacted panels that are standard in MSFS2K2.