To be fair to developers, you have to run these sims in their ideal resolution. This seems to be a problem for (some?) users of LDS1 on LCD screens. Otherwise it is of photographic quality.The amount of data being squeezed onto the screen of sims of this nature (PMDG and LDS1) deserve some decent screen "real estate". My ancient 17" CRT is struggling with both sims ;-) (or is it just my eyesight failing?) :(Anyway.... 'Nuff said (at least on this forum) about LDS. A fair picture of the another sim cannot be gained from another developer's forum. A _neutral_ forum would be required. Having said that, my final comment on the subject.... Claims that the system modelling (overall) in LDS's 767 is inferior to PMDG's NG is utter tosh (this is based on my involvement with both sims and my knowledge of aircraft as a aircaft engineer). The 744 will be the decider, for sure ;-) Thanks. Cheers.Ian.

Both the PMDG 737 and the LDS 767 are magnificent aircraft. Both deserve to be bought because they are that good!This v that should only be used for general comparisions, both these products are winners, simple as that... drop the boxing match.Armen at EGLLwww.veryquiet.com