Randy,>While the PSS is a nice package it has not been recieved >well by real world A320 pilotsthat depends on which A320 pilots you ask. There are a few of them who frequent the PSS forum and are obviously quite happy with the PSS A320 series.Martin767 fetishistIt's a lot like life and that's what's appealing

Well you have a point. But I go by my close friend who flew for Dragon Air {A320 F/O} so at least I know where the opine is really comming from. Plus if you count the number of those who don't like the PSS bus who claim to be A320 etc pilots, those who like it are in the minority.Best Wishes, Randy J. Smith [h3]" A little learning is a dangerous thing"[/h3]AMD XP 2100 |MUNCHKIN 512 DDR RAM |ECS[/b ][i] K7S5A MB[/i] |GF3 64 MEG |WIN XP PRO |MITSUBISHI DIAMOND PLUS 91 19"

>Plus if you count the number of >those who don't like the PSS bus who claim to be A320 etc >pilots, those who like it are in the minority.Have you conducted a survey? ;-)I guess the bottom line is that the PSS A320 series is a reasonably accurate A320 simulation within the constraints of FS2002. It's not in the PIC league, but I think it does its job well for a flight every now and then.Martin767 fetishistIt's a lot like life and that's what's appealing

Lets just look at the developing time here, PIC took 2 years (correct me if i'm wrong), PSS projects will generally take no more than 6 months, obviously there are good and bad sides. I think if PSS took 2 years developing a project it would probably be superior to what PIC is today.But thats just my opinion. :-)

Ok...here