What do you think ?I

They are both very very nice. If you like being at the airport and seeing a lot of activity and actually hearing some of it, then I would say Emma Field. If you like difficult approaches onto a small landing strip, go for Georender.Pesoanlly, I prefer Ema Field for a quiet Sunday afternoon plane spotting :-) :-outta Francois :-wave[table border=0 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=0][tr][td valign=bottom" align="center]"At home in the wild"[/td][td valign=bottom" align="center][link:avsim.com/alaska/alaska_051.htm|Don's Alaskan Bush Charters]"Beavers Lead the Way"[/td][td valign=bottom" align="center][link:www.avsim.com/vfr_center/mainpages/vfr_flights_main_page.htm]VFR Flight Center]"Looking Good Outside"[/td][/tr][tr][td valign=top" align="center]http://avsim.com/hangar/air/bfu/logo70.gif[/td][td valign="top" align="left" colspan=2]http://www.fssupport.com/images/moose2.gif[/td][tr][/table]________________________Francois A. "Navman" DumasAssociate Editor &Forums AdministratorAVSIM Online![/bemail: [email protected]________________________

If you go with Georender, be sure to dowload the service pack, which installs frame rate friendly trees. Also check out this website to see just hhow accuretly Lago got things: www.omen.com/f/flyingm.html(outstanding!).

I like Emma Field a lot. The sounds have got to be heard to be believed. Makes me feel like I'm actually at an airfield instead of just sitting in front of a comp (social life? whats that? :-lol)http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/edenw/FS_..._banner_je4.jpg Long Live General Aviation!

Get them both! They are both well done and both are great. Emma will keep you busy for hours. Change days and times for differnt things happening too. This is a fully animated scenery.Don

thanks you guys for the feedback...which one affects more the frame-rate ?Ulisses

Also if you have Emma field you can make the short hop to Ranger Creek, givin you a destination to fly to ;).Alex

Hmm. both sceneries are not for slow computers. I see no real difference.Alex