Any feedback on ImagineSim's latest release. I am waiting for some +/- info regarding this. The shots the have posted on their website are not convincing enough.Kroswynd

Hi Kroswynd, I'm surprised you missed the demo at there page you can check out its only 12mb in size so far its really well done they have said that they will upgrade it to fsx once the sp1 comes out and see how that gos there also working on a better Jetway system this is all from the manual I haven't purchased it yet, but I will soon But it looks great so far from the demo running the cls dc-10 fps are high in the 19s but go down to all way to 12 only for a short time mostly at the big terminal but I have ai at 50% and mostly high settings on fs9, I'm also gonna be on the process of upgrading my system to a Intel E6420 processor, so that definitely sould boost everything up a lot I own there kewr and that runs ok.I'm really proud of Imaginesim they always make airports nobody else wants to tackle I mean so many people complain about how its not worth making airports around the nyc area due to the fps hit around that area and heavy traffic, but it is worth it to me and a lot of other folks around here, I used to live in nyc many many years ago and only used lga 1 time as a passenger and the view was really cool, so go check it out the demo it is a really well done scenery so a big thank you to Imaginesim team for bringing this one out for us !http://www.imaginesim.com/klga01.htm

Did one circuit lga-pvd-lga using the F1-ATR and it was exceptional.No stutters or much degrade in FPS.Dep used 04 and the Arrival was 022.I would suggest that someone build an AFCAD using crossing runways since lga is a mother for congestion at peak hours.I turned off the statics and I kept the gnd traffic on.This is my 5th airport by them and I would say they are one notch below FlyTampa/FlightScenery(pvd/pdx) as I use them for my benchmark, but still a 4 out of 5 given the fact they just plopped down a very busy airport in NYC with very little FPS loss.Andy