November 4, 200916 yr As I have read in previous posts, FSX is heavily dependent on clock speed rather than number of cores. Will I see any improvement if I upgraded from my current system which is an AMD dual core X2 6000 (3.1Ghz) to an Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400? My current system has 4 gig RAM and evga 9600 GT Low Power GPU. Thanks for all your advice.
November 4, 200916 yr Not a whole lot.... maybe some improvement in smoothness. If you're going to upgrade go with the Core i7 line, like an overclocked 920It's not worth the cost to go from a AMD6000 to that Q.... imho and I use the same cpu as you.Now if you overclock the CPU a lot, like at a minimum to 3.4 it would help....but you'll need a good cooler for that | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
November 5, 200916 yr Thanks for your response.Suppose I upgraded from my current CPU X2 6000 to Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 which is the highest clock speed, would that bring about a significant increase in performance?
November 5, 200916 yr K8 is pretty slow compared to Conroe/Penryn. I'd say you could see significant gains, particularly when overclocking.Once upon a time I had an Opteron 175. Dual core 2.2GHz dual 1MB L2 caches, overclocked to 2.5-2.7 (depending upon ambient temps). An X2 6000 is in the same performance class as that CPU, and that's respectable. I had that chip back in 2005-2006. The slowest machine I own/maintain for friends/family is in the same performance class. In a web surfing machine. Upgrades are *cheap* right now. If you really want to do it, might as well spend a few bucks more for a Lynnfield i7/i5 system.
November 7, 200916 yr Thanks for all your responses. Folks have been helpful. After much digging, I'll be going with AMD II Phenom 965.
Create an account or sign in to comment