Not radar vectoring area

[Guest angola001]

HiI wonder if it will be possible in v5 fly IFR in areas without radar vectoring information but with HF traffic information e.g 8888 and aircraft making IFBP Blind on 126.90?If not...I want to suggestion this!thanks

[ronzie 21]

Is this topic what your question is about?Destination Airport not Served by Approach on page 47 of the RC 4.3 user manual already implemented?Are you talking also about aircraft inter communications where an airport controller is not present such as CTAF aircraft position reports in the IAP and traffic pattern under VFR and IFR conditions?

[PeteP 2]

Is this topic what your question is about?Destination Airport not Served by Approach on page 47 of the RC 4.3 user manual already implemented?Are you talking also about aircraft inter communications where an airport controller is not present such as CTAF aircraft position reports in the IAP and traffic pattern under VFR and IFR conditions?

No, his question is about neither of those situations. IFBP is the "In-Flight Broadcast Procedure", an IATA procedure for use in the AFI region - i.e. Africa - where, in parts, en-route ATC provision for IFR flights varies from minimal to non-existent. The procedure consists of pilots transmitting their own position reports and level change intentions in English on a common frequency (126.9) for the benefit of other pilots in the vicinity to enable them to provide their own separation.

[Guest angola001]

PeterP...Thanks for the explanation. That's right :(

[ronzie 21]

Thanks, Pete.For this to work in RC5 I would imagine be a major change. If jd would write a CTAF (similar procedure for non-controlled airports - Common Traffic Advisory Frequency) for airport localities where applicable I would then imagine the same routine (programming wise) would be similar based on an FIR (or lack thereof) database area.It would probably not be in the initial few releases of RC5 but one never knows :)

[PeteP 2]

It would probably not be in the initial few releases of RC5 ...

I think I would be inclined to agree with that. :( P.

[Guest angola001]

really seems to be quite complicated to simulate this .... but what will be the opinion of JD?

[jd 57]

really seems to be quite complicated to simulate this .... but what will be the opinion of JD?

what would i be opining?jd

[Guest angola001]

Yes.....What is the possibility of inplement procedures IFBP..in AFI region!you can do this in RC V5?

[jd 57]

Yes.....What is the possibility of inplement procedures IFBP..in AFI region!you can do this in RC V5?

i can't comment. there are other things to be done, which are ahead of this on the list of things to do.jd

[Guest angola001]

Ok Thanks JD