Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

GodAtum

How come some triple screens are not stretched?

Recommended Posts

this is what I have found,

 

Early triple screen setups used lower horizontal resolutions, ie. around 3800 x 1200. which works out to aprox. 3 to 1 ratio. This has now risen to some running at 6000 x 1080, nearly 6 to 1.

 

the horizontal has increased a lot and the vertical has decreased a little, almost 3 times wider. ( in theory )

 

My early setup used 4066 x 1200 and there was no stretching at all, my new setup will do 6000+ x 1200 as I'm using older monitors, but the distortion at the edges is quite noticable.

 

I find around 5080 x 1200 gives a better image. maybe some of these video's were made using lower resolution.

 

watch this video, href="

">
</a></p>

 

he is running 4066 x 1080 I think, or around there, no stretching at all. He explains a lot, especially the part on aspect ratio and zoom levels.

 

Hope this helps.

Ron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link. i dont get how he worked out the correct viewing distance? My screen resolution is 5760x1080 with 3 24" monitors.

 

i think i worked out the correct zoom?

0.18 x (5760/1080) = 0.96

My current zoom is 0.60 and has severe side distortion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link. i dont get how he worked out the correct viewing distance? My screen resolution is 5760x1080 with 3 24" monitors.

 

i think i worked out the correct zoom?

 

0.18 x (5760/1080) = 0.96
My current zoom is 0.60 and has severe side distortion.

You really need to set the zoom somewhere between .8 and 1 to make the side distortion almost acceptable.

 

gb.


YSSY. Win 10, 6700K@4.8, Corsair H115i Cooler, GTX980Ti, 32GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200, Samsung 960 EVO M.2 256GB, ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger, Corsair HX850i 850W, Thermaltake Core X31 Case, Samsung 4K 65" TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find around 5080 x 1200 gives a better image. maybe some of these video's were made using lower resolution.

 

Hi Ron.

 

I assume 5080X1200 was possible on older 3X 4:3 type monitors only?

 

Thanks,

gb.


YSSY. Win 10, 6700K@4.8, Corsair H115i Cooler, GTX980Ti, 32GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200, Samsung 960 EVO M.2 256GB, ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger, Corsair HX850i 850W, Thermaltake Core X31 Case, Samsung 4K 65" TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gb,

I have the older wide screen 16 :10 monitors  max res of 1920 x 1200

sorry typo,  I should have put 5040 x 1200, not 5080. ( each set to 1680 x 1200 )

 

I can do 5760, but as I said,  I keep it a notch lower as it looks better.  Less distortion, and the quality is not much difference.     As mentioned in the video,

increase aspect ratio =  increases distortion at the edges.

Zoom out=    increases distortion.   ( I use around 1. )

 

I also only use 3 screens just for outside view, gauges etc. on other monitors,  Changing the wideview aspect in .cfg to false can reduce stretching in some cases when running view only, as it does not lock the vertical picture, and in effect reduces aspect ratio. 

A lot of add on aircraft only use 3D mode, so I generally keep it to 'True', otherwise the instrument panel appears too close. and you have to zoom out to see them, zoom out increases stretching??. :huh:

 

In the video, he is using 3 x 4:3 monitors, no signs of distortion.

 

It's something you will have to experiment with, to find what is acceptable,  I do believe that it's worse with the wider screens ( 16:9 )  than it used to be with old 4:3.

 

I have studied the video many times, he also has 2 more on you tube with same title, 2 & 3.

It can get a little too involved sometimes. :blink:

 

Ron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


I should have put 5040 x 1200, not 5080. ( each set to 1680 x 1200 )

 

Ron thanks for the info.

I'm running 3X 1900X1200 (native) as well with nvidia surround (6040X1200 bevel corrected).

I don't see any options for 5040X1200.

I do have 5040X1050 listed.

 

??

 

gb.


YSSY. Win 10, 6700K@4.8, Corsair H115i Cooler, GTX980Ti, 32GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200, Samsung 960 EVO M.2 256GB, ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger, Corsair HX850i 850W, Thermaltake Core X31 Case, Samsung 4K 65" TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gb,

 

that could be the one, too many different resolutions.  But you can create custom resolutions etc.

 

The point is,  lower the resolution and aspect ratio to reduce the distortion,  something to try out.

 

I will have another look to see if that is in fact what I have.   Just lower the resolution for the horizontal and see if it makes a difference :rolleyes:

 

Ron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ron,

in search for a sollution to my problem (I'm not the only one apparently) I discovered these posts. Now my head is buzzing even more  :P . The explanation about the photo stuff in the YouTube video I understand (used to be a photographer by trade) but all the other chat goes to fast for me to follow and translate at the same time. But I'm going to listen to it a few more times occasionally, you never know.

I appreciate it that you take so much time the help out the forum members  :excl:

 

regards, 

 

Eddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    40%
    $10,070.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...