And now the Airwolf song is stuck in my head, thanks..  :lol:

 

haha - you're welcome.

I think you'll find that is why they call it is non-precision approach.

 

Better ban visual approaches then, too.

 

ILS and MLS are the only approaches classed as precision approaches. RNAV and GNSS approaches use GPS as primary, and have a laundry list of requirements before you can conduct approaches with them. I personally don't like them because of the GPS element.

 

Best regards,

Robin.

I think they should change it to NO precision. I agree GPS isn't the all singing dancing solution and many issues, hence why the long list of requirements before you can, fly, publish, one.

 

But there is my point, all those things to fly something which in general is fairly accurate, the issues that can go wrong are far more remote than would be with an NDB, where NDB...hmmm, you get more accuracy tuning into local radio station, and yet not a whole list of caveats to publish, fly one. Which is as I said if you invented it today, it would never be allowed.

 

An some people are banned from visual approaches