He came out with a SMF scenery that is claimingthat it is FS2004 compatible, but it is not. Personally I think by making it available in theFile section as a 2002/2004 compat product isnot correct and mis-leading. It does not workcorrectly in FS9 at all. Can some one correct this?The Main problem is the AI is all over the place and goes thru buildings and dont follow taxi-ways . . .Mike

So then its just an AFCAD problem which you can easily solve yourself with a little reading and patience. When you've solved it, you can even share the file with the community.

Hi"So then its just an AFCAD problem which you can easily solve yourself with a little reading and patience. When you've solved it, you can even share the file with the community."Now Kurt you just know by the title of this thread it ain`t gonna happen.Getting snotty is so much easier you know?Troy

Boohooo someone gave me something for free and it doesn't work! I want my money back! :-eek

>He came out with a SMF scenery that is claiming>that it is FS2004 compatible, but it is not. >Personally I think by making it available in the>File section as a 2002/2004 compat product is>not correct and mis-leading. It does not work>correctly in FS9 at all. if you had read the description you would have knownthat the AI would not work well.File Description:Sacramento International Airport KSMF For FS2002 and FS2004 Highly detailed and realistic scenery of the Sacramento International airport. Using color satellite photos, this is as real as it gets. Includes all taxiway signs, RW and ILS hold stops. An AFCAD file is included for FS2002 only. Gerrish Gray's Trees_V3.zip required. This file replaces KSMF03_127368.zip which had errors. then,if you had bothered to read the readme,you would have understood the AI doesn't work,because Afcad2 wasn't availible when he created this scenery."...that this file is compatible with both FS2002 and FS2004. The only difference is that AFCAD and AI traffic management for FS2004 are not developed yet"to complete:i think you owe mr Cline an apology,as he has quite evidently stated what you could expect.tataJP.