Just wondering, are many people running paid for scenery in v3.2 or the new 3.3.5 that is officially stated by the developers as compatible with either v1 or v2? I have several such sceneries and would like to add them if this is ok. Seems such as waste otherwise. I am quite familiar with the folder structures, just don't want to risk messing up my sim by experimenting.

Sorry, hate to bump my own topic but reading it, might not have stated my question very clearly.

 

When a scenery is stated as being P3Dv2 compatible, does it have a different code structure to that used in P3Dv3 or is it simply a case of placing files/folders in different locations?

 

We talk about developers providing "updated installers" for making v2 scenery v3 compatible. Is it just the installer, or is it also the actual code in the scenery files that has been edited?

In most, if not all cases, you will not have any problems running a V2 scenery in V3. Usually it is just the installer that detects a new path in the registry. But the actual files are the same.

Thanks Cargostorm, I'm going to take a chance and try to install Aerosoft's Kilimanjaro and see what happens. It is listed as V2 compatible, no indication from Aerosoft that it will be updated to support V3. [No response to that Q on their forum.]

 

 

Cheers!