January 23, 20179 yr I was thinking about this today. In all the discussions about P3D performance/settings we often talk about a high end computer vs medium vs low end. I realize this is a moving target and there is a continuum, especially as technology changes yearly (if not faster), but what fits the definition of each? Specifically, looking at my specs in my sig, how would one define my system? Regards, Todd Harrell Computer: i7 3770k @ 4.6 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, GTX 1070 GPU, 750W PSU, 250 GB SSD (Win 7), 500 GB SSD (P3D), 2 x 1TB HDD, 28-inch Viewsonic 1080p monitor Sim: P3Dv3
January 23, 20179 yr I guess there is no precise definition for this. In my opinion, even if a system like yours is quite common in flight simulation world, if I compare it to most home or gaming computers that I see every day, then it is definitely high-end: you have an unlocked i7 (even if 3rd gen) and a 1070, plus a bunch of other nice features such as the 2 SSD. You computer is more than enough for 99% of today AAA titles. You could of course have a "higher end" system with newer generation features (7th gen unlocked CPU with liquid cooling, 1080 or Titan, DDR4, NVME SSD) but that would actually represent quite a "small" increase in performance compared to the big cost difference you would get. The fact is that you should always compare the system to your needs. This is quite obvious when rating GPU, where you should take into consideration the resolution you want to use. A GTX1060 would be a low end card for VR or 2160p gaming but it is absolutely an high-end card in 1080p. Asus Z87 // Intel i7-4770k // 16GB RAM DDR3 // GTX770 4GB // Thrustmaster T.16000 // 2x Saitek Throttle Quadrant // Saitek Rudder Pedals Prepar3d V3.4 // Active Sky 2016 // ORBX FTX Global/Vector/OpenLC // FSDT GSX // EZCA Planning with PFPX and TOPCAT, flying the Aerosoft A320 on IVAO and VATSIM
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.