August 18, 200619 yr Instead of discussing all this stuff, I'll just answer your question.No, I would not.
August 18, 200619 yr Hi,Have you tried Radar Contact 4 with and without AI Smooth?Hope this helps,Jimhttp://www.hifisim.com/Active Sky V6 Development Team Active Sky V6 Proud SupporterHiFi Beta TeamRadar Contact Supporter: http://www.jdtllc.com/AirSource Member: http://www.air-source.us/FSEconomy Member:http://www.fseconomy.com/
August 18, 200619 yr 1) As I have mentioned MANY times, AI Smooth is not designed to handle efficiently AI traffic in airports that have more than 500+ operations per day oreither have more than 3040 arrivals per hour. AI Smooth usually send 50% of arriving traffic into absolutely unrealistic and ugly-looking holding patterns and eventually many of those planes dissapear without any chance to land.AI Smooth is good in small domestic airports such as KRIC, KBUF, KALB or KROC. However it's useless n KORD, KDFW etc. 2) I love RC4 as a ATC tool for user-plane, however it's useless as far as AI concerned. It can hold the closest AI to you in either air or ground, but there's no conceptual approach to handle the entire AI planes' environment.I'll wait and see what RC5 might offer as far as AI ATC concerned, but I'm almost 99% sure that AI behavior linked with AI-approaches that hardly coded in Scenery folder for each individual airport (not AFCAD, but XML-type file that contaits data for AI vectors)
Create an account or sign in to comment