A Few New Potential Feature ideas

[kiek 1,229]

On 2/2/2022 at 7:02 PM, VFXSimmer said:

1) About the parking.  Understood.  Makes sense.  One question, I have no idea how you have it structured in the code, but maybe the test for the "takeover to park" logic would only occur below some minimum threshold speed, and maybe the diameter to test for the "near to gate" condition just for this autopark condition could be set to a smaller radius than what you use for the current algorithm.  I would think you coudl STILL keep the current method running in the event a plane "misses" the gate for autopark as a failsafe to still insure you capture as many as possible.  Even with the current limitation of RT's 4 digit precision, I'm still impressed with how close most planes actual DO get in terms of parking at the gate.

Implemented in the next version. I'm using a small radius and the distance between the last two positions should be not more than 20 meters (in 9 seconds) is about 5 kts..

Another small improvement. 😉

 

[VFXSimmer 1,310]

On 2/5/2022 at 2:04 AM, kiek said:

Implemented in the next version. I'm using a small radius and the distance between the last two positions should be not more than 20 meters (in 9 seconds) is about 5 kts..

Another small improvement. 😉

 

Cant wait to try them out!