February 19, 20242 yr I'm having a big lag between ATC/pilots interactions. Sometimes more than a minute for vectors. Anyone can help? Thanks.
February 19, 20242 yr I have experienced some delayed responses recently when using FSHUD but nothing as bad as you describe. It is probably worth opening a support ticket with them or posting on their forums, which can be found here https://www.simforums.com/forums/
February 19, 20242 yr Commercial Member Hello, Such things should be forwarded via application tickets. Please open a ticket for this issue in order to provide reasons why it happens in most productive way. To open a ticket, click on "Support" button in application main window. Thank you
March 6, 20242 yr Hello, I am not sure where I needed to post this but here goes, I’m sure you guys have heard of Beyond ATC, a lot of people are waiting for me and I was too but as someone that has flown on VATSIM and the frustration of not having ATC in a lot of places and at the times you want to fly, I’ve tried PRO ATC SR AND Pilot2ATC recently. The former has been abandoned and the latter not good so I decide to try FSHUD. I have to say it’s pretty good especially because it controls the whole traffic both the ones injected by FSLTL, that is bad word not allowed and I want to say to the developer, you have something very good here. I want to suggest you add voice. I want to speak for the ATCs myself and make the button optional. Once you do this and you improve on the voices a little more, you are offering basically the same things Beyond ATC is about to bring out. Well done to you and if you have the voice before Beyond ATC is released, I objectively will see no reason to abandon FSHUD for it. Well done.
March 6, 20242 yr On 2/19/2024 at 5:17 PM, FSHud said: Hello, Such things should be forwarded via application tickets. Please open a ticket for this issue in order to provide reasons why it happens in most productive way. To open a ticket, click on "Support" button in application main window. Thank you This is not a support but another suggestion. When I was about to land in Bali, the active runway for the other aircrafts was runway 9 but because I programmed 27 from simbrief, it stuck to it. I know there’s the option to change it but I got that option a little too late. I would suggest as in real life, ATC dictates and determines which runway to use and that should be communicated to the pilot from the center. Descend FL150 expect runway 09. Let the ATC use one tu way for everyone.
March 6, 20242 yr Commercial Member 2 hours ago, Planet Arcadia said: This is not a support but another suggestion. When I was about to land in Bali, the active runway for the other aircrafts was runway 9 but because I programmed 27 from simbrief, it stuck to it. I know there’s the option to change it but I got that option a little too late. I would suggest as in real life, ATC dictates and determines which runway to use and that should be communicated to the pilot from the center. Descend FL150 expect runway 09. Let the ATC use one tu way for everyone. Hello, This is part of the content we are currently working on. There is full list of next upcoming content in our BETA:1. Airborne separation (vectors, speed control, direct to shortages).2. Proper runway change handling by avoiding situation of opposite landing/takeoff.3. Reduce amount of heading vectors on approach-transition step with option to ask direction vectors any time. 4. More reliable ground handling that avoids long queues and non-proper behavior. The second paragraph exactly speaks about the problem you've mentioned. Thank you
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.