Hello All,OK, I'm a former ProFlight user, and found that program to be very good . . . I even got it to work in 2002 for a while, until something went wacko and now I can't create any more flights . . . so, reading all about RD, It seems that this is the replacement I am looking for . . . Am I missing something or is this my answer to PF for 2002?Have never used RD before and would appreciate any comparisons.Thanks in advance to all,Clayton T. DopkeMajor, USAF (retired)"Drac"[email protected]

RC :-)there are things that pf2k did, that we don't do. download the manual. read the manual. see if it is right for you. ask any questions you have here.

Hi Clayton,If you scan the back messages on this forum you should find some comments posted by other former Proflight users. You can also read an independent review of RC on Flightsim.com...http://www.flightsim.com/cgi/kds?$=main/review/rc3/rc3.htmIf you're using fs2002, your choices are pretty much limited to RC or the default fs atc. There's no question that RC is far superior for IFR atc.Sidney Schwartz [KPDX]MyTraffic/Radar Contact/FSMeteo/FSSE/FSassist/FDCHorizon Flights--flight plans and scenery for FS2002http://sidneyschwartz.homestead.com/index.html

The One thing I miss in RC compered to PF2000 is the diffrent accents around the world, tht was a nice feture.But RC is the best ATC addon to FS2002, no doubt.//Johan

if everyone who misses the different accents around the world, would record a set of controller scripts, the lack of accents would be solved.go to scott's website, and download the record utility and the controller/pilot scripts.

Thanks All,Guess I'll download the manual and see for myself . . . it sounds like a great program.Clay