CS-TMT

Any news on this addon aircraft? There's been a long time since it was announced and nothing else was heard from it again.

Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately I don't know how to convert them to the new ktx2 format. Unfortunately I'm pessimistic regarding that, because the Cessna 182 is different between both versions.

Thanks for your quick reply! I still don't know what scenery is doing this, as I didn't have the time nor patience to test each scenery for it (or in bundles). I'll do it some day. Regarding the error console in dev mode, I don't know how to use it, but I'll do some research. Once again, thank you for your amazing software that can show my fictional private fleet when I land or depart from the airport where they are based 🙂 which otherwise wouldn't show up.

Carenado doesn't have paint kits (layered, that is), but the package itself brings a blank/all white aircraft which textures you can use as templates and paint from them.

Just came here to congratulate you for keeping developing this amazing product! Like someone previously said, I also didn't notice that there was an update, since SimMarket doesn't notify us. Since April 2024 I have been having an issue with one of my sceneries on FS2020 (still don't have 2024). When compiling the gate database, mat a certain point, the simulator closes itself without any error and the gate information stops creating the database. Unfortunately the latest WAMA version didn't solve the problem.

Hello everyone! Has anyone purchased the C210 for FS2020 who has already used the P3D version in the past? I have a custom made livery for the P3D version which I would like to migrate to the MSFS version, but before I spend money on the aircraft I want to know if both are compatible. I mean, if I open a texture dds from the FS2020 version and paste the corresponding texture from the dds from the P3D version, will they coincide? I want to use my personal fictional livery, but I don't want to do it again from scratch. Wanting a high-wing for 6 occupants and having missed it on FS2020, I ended up going to the SWS Kodiak and doing the livery on it, but I would prefer a piston engine. I used the Carenado 206 back on FS2004 and P3Dv2 and the 210 on P3Dv4. Thanks in advance!

It's true indeed, but there are stil a lot of people who can't afford to have a super computer that is able to run FSX/P3D with the settings maxed out and with many addons (aircraft ans scenery mainly) like FS9 is now able to (and for some time now, in fact) with a medium-end computer for today's standards. Plus, and this is only a personal opinion, FSX brought a lot of revollutionary features, but there are others that I don't like, and in terms of views I recall the inability to get "near" the aircraft on spot view instead of only maintaining the same distance and zooming it, like if the image was taken with a photo camera standing static but only zooming. Anyway, this is only the evolution. Some specs come in, some others go out. It's ordinary. The only real bad thing about FSX or P3D is that not "many" people cann afford a PC that runs it smoothly and maxed out.

Shame on Gulfstream Me too! :(

I'd love to see a decent Gulfstream G650, but that would be difficult to happen, as I read sometime ago that Gulfstream doesn't facultate the schematics noor flight characteristics to FS developers because they don't want their aircraft to be reproduced for FS. Idon't know whether this is true or not, but... Oh well... And I'd love to have a Bombardier Global (doesn't matter what series) to fly in FS.

Things are OK in that subject now, thanks! After sending the last message here regarding it, I checked my e-mail a little after that and it was solved. Thanks Ron!

Just for the record, I have just sent another e-mail to the support address of Eaglesoft regarding my account not being activated yet after exactly two weeks from my registration

I did that again a couple of days ago but had no success. I'll try it again! ^_^

The answer is quite simple in fact. After some extensive searches on Google and finding some links to this forum, where a member of Eaglesoft replied to someone with that same issue, I came to find that the problem was as simple as... The Navigraph data used. Developing the subject a little more, those who, like me, have multiple addons, namely Wilco Airbus, may find the Navdata of the Wilco to be "the same" that Eaglesoft uses on the Citation X. That is, the "building" of the database appears to be the same used between them, although the location on the hard drive is not the same. So, as I have a fictional private airport made by myself with the correspondent database for some addons namely Wilco Airbus, I just copied the Navdata of this addon to the location of the one used by Eaglesoft. The problem is that although the database appears to be the same in the two addons, and the Citation X FMS can load the one from Wilco, in its depts they are not the same. Voila! I installed a database specifically build for the Eaglesoft addon and the MFD freeze didn't happen anymore. I now have to discover the differencies between them so I can use the Citation X in my private fictional aerodrome, when I have some time to dive inside de depts of that MS Access file. I hope that helps you. So if you are using the Wilco or other addon database with Eaglesoft, try to install the one made for Eaglesoft itself and see if that still happens.

As I am unable to post (or search for info on it) on Eaglesoft's forum due to my account registration not being activated since I registered two weeks ago (yes, I wrote an e-mail to the admin out there), I'm trying to get some help here. After buying the addon and finally having the "MFD Freeze" and "no idle throttle/no reverse" issues solved, I wanted to do some test flights before the delivery flight of my private Citation X. I made the flight plan around KCEA (Cessna Factory in Wichita) on FS Build to know how much fuel I needed and then made ut on the Citation X FMS. Everything goes right, except when completing the performance initialization and confirming it and after completing the takeoff initialization. I get a "takeoff out of limits" message no matter what weight I have (I've tried with only the pilot and copilot at 170LB per pax, plus 20LB of cargo, with the fuel indicated by FS Build, or less fuel or even with full tanks, as well as a "check DMU" and "check dest fuel" and on takeoff data, the "RWY USE/REQ" shows the selected runway length ans it should, but on the "REQ" part, it always shows 0, no matter what, and no V speeds are computed, neither for take off or afterwards for the landing. As the runway at KCEA is only about 3800ft long, I tried the same at the nearby KIAB, which has a ~11000ft runway, with no flight plan (only the departure airport and runway and arrival airport and runway, also at KIAB) and the "REQ" runway still says 0 and all those "takeoff out of limits" and the other messages still show up when completing the perf and t/o init and no V speeds are computed either. Can someone enlighten me on what may be wrong?

Yup! I know that. First time I went to add them to te Wilco database I opened the MS Access file and got mad at it :blink: "what's this?". Well, but after all I managed to understand how it worked and added them with no problem. At least for Wilco Airbus.