Jump to content

vadriver

Members
  • Content Count

    1,699
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vadriver


  1. 3 hours ago, davenicoll said:

    used it in Prepar3d and it worked brilliantly for what I needed

    but you prefer a VFR orientated version .... which seems to suit MSFS.

    so should there be 2 versions,  a PF/GA/VFR/non pressurised version & an IFR/pressurised/PNF version ... each optimised for the procedures/airspace flown rather than compromised to suit both ???


  2. 16 minutes ago, verbal said:

    just covering bases and wondering

    I have always installed the appropriate version ...... though mainly to manage aircraft & scenery editing with the likes of ADE, MConX etc.

    & there is a wealth of info on P3D workings if you are a "tweaker".


  3. 20 minutes ago, MarcG said:

    - A team capable of delivering a solid VR product, to help move forward from the bare bones experience and the blatant lack of interest we've had from MS/Asobo since December 2020 when VR was first introduced.

    - A team capable of fixing bugs, dealing with a far better structured beta process and one that takes Quality Control seriously, unlike what we've had since launch.

    - A weather team that can also take this feature forward and/or fix the many issues associated with this area since the debacle that was SU7 METAR integration.

    - Hire some of the incredible freeware talent as a team to help improve the overall experience.

    Basically teams that can do a much better job than MS/Asobo in certain areas where they're clearly struggling, just like what we got with Working Title which worked out brilliantly.

    surely it is not that crook 😎

×
×
  • Create New...