Jump to content

abranpuko

The Dungeon
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    993

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by abranpuko

  3. Posted

    It would be wonderful to be able to have a trafficboard, like it was in fsx and prepar3d, for msfs. Being able to see in it the flights in real time: arrivals and departures. And see, among them, ours in process.
    I do not think that it is that hard. There was a guy who did it for MSFS, taking Flightradar24 into account and inserting the users plane... but I lost track of him, or nothing has been heard from him anymore. His idea was very good.
    Any creative developer dare???

    • Like 1

  4. Posted

    9 hours ago, kiek said:

    Hi guys,

    I don't see why PSXT_Learner would help flying to airports that perform badly in PSXTraffic...(KDTW)

    If there is less gnd traffic reaching gates, PSXT_Learner (now always and only in  Learn destination mode, you know) will not find many park options. It does real learning only, if I remember well ( I am now not at my pc).

    You can only learn KDTW with PSXT, by visiting the airport many days/weeks.

    PSXT_Learner is handy at airports that do have gnd traffic, for users like abranpuko, that go for the extra mile in immersion.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Thanks Kiek for your advice. What I don't understand is, why before PSXTraffic appeared, Learner was a great tool and the comments were very good, and suddenly, after the new PSXTraffic program, everything that is said about PSXT and Learner is bad. I am still delighted with the use of Learner that you have invented as a tool. Not to go to airports where there is no coverage, like the one you cite: KDTW, but many others where it is very very useful and certainly, with a great touch of realism. Those of us who are part of the minority appreciate, for sure, that there are several options in life to choose from. (if these do not cause harm to anyone, as is the case).

  5. Posted

    2 hours ago, kiek said:

    Everything that is available is in the snapshot that PSXT_Learner creates when PSXT tells him to stop learning. All the aircraft in the snapshot are spawned irrespective of the parking percentage. You can check the snapshot yourself.

    Btw no one else responds to posts from you about destination learning. Are you the only one usung this function? If so that would be too bad...

     

    I appreciate your response.
    I don't know if I'm the only one using "PSXT_Learner". The fact that people do not post messages here does not mean in any case that they are not using it. That conclusion would be very simple.
    In any case, if it was just me...would that deserve the punishment?
    I only pay for the Realtraffic professional license, to be able to have that little extra in the parking lot.
    Does that cause any discomfort?

  6. Posted

    3 hours ago, kiek said:

    Are you questions about the Learn destination mode in PSXT? I guess you are:

    Is there a way to only have the planes that should be without new injections to complete the chosen percentage?
    Not at the moment, but could be aded as an option.

    In the same way, if the percentage is lower and there are more planes in reality, could PSXT inject the missing ones?
    Not with static parked planes because PSXT does not have that info, but live aircraft may appear at these place gradually.

    Oh, so the first option could work!.

    That would mean that if I arrive at an airport, which I have, for example, at 30 percent percentage, but at that moment in real life, it is at 15 percent, could PSXT show only the planes that are there without completing 30? percent? On the other hand, if Realtraffic, in conjunction with PSXT_Learner for MSFS, has been collecting data from planes arriving and departing from the destination airport. Why would it be difficult for PSXT to add those that exceed the chosen percentage? It is assumed that these data are already available. No? Thank you very much for reading my proposal!

  8. Posted

    Hello. I have a question and I would like to know if it is possible to solve it: When I arrive at an airport, where psxt_Learner has previously done its work, I find that the planes are indeed parked as they have been in real life. But, due to the percentage of "parked aircraft" (live and static), many times, some spots are filled with aircraft that are not actually there. It is difficult to know the exact percentage that would correspond to the exact and real occupancy of planes at the airport. Is there a way to only have the planes that should be without new injections to complete the chosen percentage? In the same way, if the percentage is lower and there are more planes in reality, could PSXT inject the missing ones?

  9. Posted

    1 hour ago, kiek said:

    Aha, never been there. I always said, I'll go there on holidays when I am old and I'd like to escape the cold winters in The Netherlands, but since Climate Change that is no longer needed ...

    BTW GCTS is very well supported in PSXTraffic, as well by SimWings as MK-Studios 😉 

     

    Oh, you are from Netherlands? I really love it and would like to go again. 
    tenerife es very good all the year in relation with climate. 
    yes, GCTS good coberture, but GCXO, GCLP very bad coberture. 

    come here on holydays and we can put some new radars! 😎
     

  11. Posted

    15 minutes ago, AeroMaster12 said:

    Wow, that was fast! Thank you, Nico!

    What's holding you back? PSXT to PSXTraffic is a pretty smooth transition - just gotta make the jump to it! 

    Oh AeroMaster....I use PSXT because i like to arrive at the airport and finding exactly the used and unused spots by ai traffic. For example, there are many charter flights now on summer, and yesterday i found a plane that never comes to my island, parked on a gate. I got informed and it was true. That sensation is deliciuos!:) 

    anyways thanks for the invitation!:)

    • Like 1

  14. Posted

    yes, there are some airports with ground handling like htat. ut LEVC was another one also. Thats why i said aircairo arrived and went to gate....it seems it didint exactly fit into the parking spot....

    anyway i hope someday all the airpot has ground radar!:) 

    thank you anyway. it would e a nice idea to have a list of realtraffic aiport that have ground traffic.

    holds!

  15. Posted

    Hello again...
    My case:
    Flight to LEVC, with PSXT Learner and Realtraffic Professional Edition. When I am arriving at LEVC, I notice on the Realtraffic radar screen that an aircairo plane is landing at LEVC. I also see how it reaches its GATE. The same thing happens shortly after with a Vueling plane.
    When I get to LEVC, Learner hasn't injected any aircraft.
    This kind of thing happens a lot lately, and at such times I wonder what could be the problem.
    The last time I had a chance to talk to you, you told me to restart the program or find another destination. But unfortunately it happens quite a lot.
    It's like Learner doesn't record incoming planes. Only in some cases, very few.
    Could you help me or take a look at your software?
    Thank you so much.

  16. Posted

    4 hours ago, kiek said:

    Yes , but looking at the GUI some time later has. This is probably just a gap in ythe RT data and you will see data flowing again later.

    Yes that is normal and this is the situation  (by design)  since about a year ago ....

    But  the only one that is important to you, being yours,  is updated_airports.

    If you want a more simple folderschema, you must move to PSXTraffic 😉 

     

     

    Thank you. Im happy with PSXT! 

    I really love to arrive at the airport and finding exactly empty the parking spots that are empty on real life at that moment. And also finding the plane that is exactly parked there. 
     

    thanks for help😉

  17. Posted

    Thank you. 

    Trying another airport has no sense if you fly to an specific one. 

    Is it normal that i have many airport folder in PSXT?

    - addon airports

    -airports archive with simaddon, stock and thirdparty

    -stock airports

    -thirdparty_airports (again)

    - updated_airpots.

    wow, sometimes a little confusing . anyway thanks for the help:)!

  18. Posted

    2 hours ago, kiek said:

    That is what it is...  will probably be temporary.

    Btw v39.0.1 is a non-production version, that's why you see this "trace message", update to 39.1.2.

    RT is not FlightRadar24, see FAQ #20

     

    Thank you but i also checked real traffic on spotter mode and EDDM was full of planes. 
    it was not temporary, it was during all flight. 
    more of this, realtraffic had more planes on EDDM than flightradar24.

  20. Posted · Edited by abranpuko

    Hello, my Learner is saying to me; No traffic received from RealTraffic in the last minute. I have the last version of Learner  and PSXT, and, of course, the professional license of RealTraffic.

    The airport is Munich, and i have seen that during those messages, the airport on flightradar24 is FULL of planes landing and taking off. 

    could you help me?

    this is the image:

    eddm.png

  22. Posted

    8 hours ago, ShawnG said:

    Lawyers for airlines don’t care enough to chase down a million broke az modders,  it would be time consuming and pointless.  If Microsoft starts doing it, those same lawyers will salivate and will fall all over themselves filing the lawsuits, because Microsoft has tons of money to sue for, and they already know how to find them. Different reality.  Modders can just do it,  Microsoft has to step carefully.

    All these testimonies put on the table once again an evidence: it's only about money, not dignity. FSLTL, Justtraffic, modders, and the other dozens of traffic software for prepar3d, fsx, etc, would have committed a huge illegality. Remember FSX, with all the airlines and traffic. They would have to report that first. In any case, MSFS should not therefore announce real air traffic online in its sales if it has not asked for permission from all the airlines in the world. Wouldn't it be a crime too?

  23. Posted

    5 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

     

    Legally speaking, all the airlines that FSLTL/AIG/FSTraffic represent in their packages would be in their full rights to ask them to stop including their livery and they would have to comply if they don't want to be taken to court.

    Microsoft doesn't want to get in trouble for using/selling someone's trademark without permission.

    Do you really believe that? The airlines are more than happy knowing that each user advertises their image for free. Fortunately, not everything the law says is fair. If you realize it, you could also report the use of the image of your house on the bing maps, which is being used by everyone who flies over the place where you live. Life is exposed to everyone's eyes. We can't cut the melon and then not give the pieces. It would be miserable. In any case, even if the airlines do not give permission, there will always be users who will do repaints of everything. 

    i have heard that there is people who forbid the sun. 😎

  24. Posted · Edited by abranpuko

    2 hours ago, Noel said:

    It's difficult when it starts with RT traffic from FlightAware (or wherever it comes from currently) with planes coming into an airport.  Those can be grabbed and controlled by MSFS ATC.  But then a live pilot (that's us) arrives into the mix and that has to be dealt with.  Early on go-arounds were much more come for me as a live pilot, but now MSFS ATC defers to me, and other traffic is usually the target of the instruct to go-around.  How else can you blend RT traffic w/ live players?

    As for liveries--it's free advertising I can't imagine any company denying permission.

    You are true. 
    I remember that, with prepare3dv5, before MSFS came into the market, lorby had a wonderful software for that. Ai Planes were taken from flight radar exactly were they were and put into the sim (same altitude, destination etc…) and after, with the software “ai separation “ the user plane was also taken into the total count of planes. So, the ai plane went to their SID OR STAR., but when i arrived to land, ai separation did the work. 
    not the best but very good. 
    now PSXT and real traffic have done the best work in my opinion. 
    im totally sure someone very creative and intelligent will arrive with some good news!

  25. Posted

    7 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

    And we have real traffic. They never promised accurate liveries or models to go with it.

    But it sounds like they're trying to get real models and liveries for 2024. Emphasis on 'Trying'. so don't be upset if they don't. They want to get permission from airlines, and not every airline is going to say yes.

    It's very funny that you have to ask the airlines for permission for airline image to be used in MSFS. Knowing that with realtraffic and livery repaints from thousands of creators we already have the libraries we want. I don't have a particular obsession with criticizing Asobo for MSFS. Furthermore, I am very grateful, because the simulator is very beautiful. But I don't usually excuse everything and I love being fair. Real online traffic means: real online. If the planes have not their real repaint because you have to ask for permission, and if they don't land with the proper separation as they do in reality and if everything is full of go arounds… then, dear friend: it is not real online traffic, even if President swears it. In any case, I already have mine solved. 

    MSFS is wonderfull and it has not real traffic online.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...