Jump to content

nazethc

The Dungeon
  • Content Count

    81
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nazethc


  1. 8 minutes ago, generale84 said:

    garbage??? seriously???

    Black Box Simulator is garbage...Aerosoft is SOP product need to be a follow up update (and It have a follow up by developer).

    Sorry meant to say utter garbage.  You can keep trying to defend it, meanwhile everyone in this thread had suggested the QW787 to the OP.  What does that tell you?


  2. 1 hour ago, generale84 said:

     

    I don't blame anyone... I said only that also when QW787 was relesed, they give it to us with bugs...differents, maybe harmless bugs, but with it.

    I start fly in '98...never seen released an addon of any kinds without a next update.

    Aerosoft even says that the 15 fps thing is not considered a bug though, which is ridiculous IMHO.  I've never experienced that with any other payware.

    • Upvote 1

  3. 3 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

    Can we please refrain from criticising the way others use their flight simulators? We all have different requirements, and there is room for everyone in the flight simulation community.

    Of course not, i'm better than you and i have to let you know. /s

     

    39 minutes ago, Raging Bull said:

    Seemingly more then everyone else.

    Not my fault you can’t do it. 🙂

    LOL I can, but I don't go around letting everyone know that i can because i need validation on a flightsim forum, and on top of that belittle the ones that do not.  

    nice try though.

    • Like 3
    • Upvote 2

  4. 7 minutes ago, Raging Bull said:

    Not sure why the MD-11 is so popular.  Overrated to the hill in my opinion. 

    Give me a early DC-10-10 or -30 at latest with INS only for nav. Of course the kids who can’t fly without a fmc or map would hate it. 

     

    Those of us with actual skills would love it though. 

    We get it you're better than everyone else......thanks for letting us know though.

    LOL flying a fake airplane and you think you have "skills"...

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Upvote 9

  5. 1 hour ago, n4gix said:

    I remain convinced however that this is indeed a "tempest in a teapot," and were it not for their previous truly "monumentally poor decision" a few months ago, this topic would never have been raised.  It is quite clear to me that there have been folks actively looking for anything that could further harm FSLab's reputation.

    As for the folks looking for anything.....yup we are....they we're caught once, and lo and behold guess what....they we're caught again, and.....

    It happened with their shenanigans with Aerosoft, it happened with test.exe, it happened with cmdhost.exe, and way back when this certain developer was working on the MD-11 there was a piece of malware that destroyed paying customers FS installs.  The company cut ties immediately after that happened.  They even knew it was way over the line. Kudos to them!

    And on top of that, they get caught out there, and their response, Legal Action.......LOL!

    Coincidence?  

    So yes, we are constantly looking.  And are NOT surprised by the results.  And we will keep looking....

    Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me four times.............

     

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 4

  6. 14 minutes ago, SpiritFlyer said:

    I doubt AVSIM will be knocking its knees and biting it' fingernails because of a legal threat by a developer colouring outside the lines, at least I hope so. There are people here with integrity.. 

    I also hope Avsim lets this thread stay up, as this is the second time FSLabs has been caught using "shady" anti-piracy methods.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

  7. 12 minutes ago, Cactus521 said:

    Any program I have ever shared over the web does not use installation routines or the registry, just local .cfg files, if needed for the program or printer parameters.  I learned how to write code in assembler and basic and c++, for MS-DOS and Windows 3.1.  Most of my programs today are backward compatible all the way back to Windows 95, and one to Windows 3.1.  I am not bragging, I cannot write business important programs to run mega companies, and I've only made one sim aircraft with crudely coded but workable XML gauges, because I wanted the aircraft to work with whatever followed FSX, and fortunately it did--my ultralight trike here at Avsim works well in P3D4.2

    I feel developers landing junk in the Windows core is garbage, and suspect.  They either do not know what they are doing or know full well what they are doing.  And if they get caught at it, I hope the market economy determines their fate.

    They may complain about pirating but holding someone's personal computer hostage, with all the other programs that have nothing to do with their product, is wrong. I am being polite and politically correct but I want these developers to imagine the words I am thinking, and I will leave it at that.

    John 

    This sums it up....well said Sir!


  8. 18 minutes ago, MarkW said:

    I have been reading about the drama on Reddit.  Someone was able to look at the files and basically said there is nothing there but placing them in the Windows directory with names similar to system names is clumsy at best.

    It might not be anything nefarious, but installing anything in the main windows directory is a big no-no....especially with no prior knowledge to the user.  But it's FSLabs, no surprise at all.  

    Go to /r/flightsim....they have all the info there, and it WONT be deleted.

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 4

  9. And the one's with the errors have ORBX, Activesky...etc.  We're the tests run by Umberto with a vanilla P3D?  Or with a similar setup like most of us who have the error?  Wasn't really specified in the post.  And again, mesh, time zone why only westbound?  Surely, if it was the case it would happen eastbound also, since the same files are loaded.


  10. 28 minutes ago, CaptKornDog said:

    Since NATs vary drastically eastbound vs westbound, has anyone tried flying the exact westbound routing that a CTD is seen on but in reverse?

    Never happened to me eastbound, I've flown eastbound through the same area from the west coast and never had a crash. 

    @Eric  yeah dunno why, but some other people in the thread also have to use the "kill" method.  


  11. 2 hours ago, F737NG said:

    nazethc, it was explained to him/her a couple of weeks ago, but was ignored then also.

    Everyone else knows and accepts that it's a Couatl problem.

    @ F737NG Lol I guess I have to take my own advice.

    @Eric I have tried the restart, and for me, it does not always work.  For me killing couatl is the only option at this point.  It's probably in the thread, but do you have Vector installed by any chance?

    @Boeing... with Eric's info we proved his hypothesis, for some restarting couatl works great, for others a kill in task manager works.  

×
×
  • Create New...