Jump to content

peplum

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Content Count

    7
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    VATSIM
  • Virtual Airlines
    No
  1. Hello, I've just tested AI Flight planner 2 yesterday to include some military activity on my FSX. But I'm disappointed with the 250 knots speed limits under 10,000 feets and also the cruise speed above 10.000 feets does not match the 1,000 knots I've set. I would like also to set, if possible the climb rate, etc... Please let me know what can I do to fix that. regards J.
  2. Maybe, but 3 thirds parties could join together to initiate a such project (maybe join the X-plane team).From my point of view, new planes and sceneries are today quite enough to enjoy FSX. They'll not going to live indefinitely from FSX, declining all aircrafts that boeing or airbus will release. .If they cannot not enter Flight or living from X-plane (I don't know this platform) , they have to investigate a new economic model and (why not ?) to create a joint venture, hiring formers dev from ACES to create what FSX enthousiast are waiting for the suite (from my point of view, essentially a new graphic engine that uses GPUs).That's a big gamble, a big blow. successes are almost always due to the daringjust my 2 cents.
  3. Why PMDG does not code its own Flight platform ?Maybe it's the good time to.Investment is too big ?
  4. Bonjour, Après avoir adoré Concorde X, je recherche une nouvelle aventure. Que choisir entre le MD11 (un peu plus cher) et le 747 ? Merci P.S : j'ai bien aimé le niveau du détail de concorde X.
  5. What about complexity of both airplanes ?I've loved Concorde X and I'm looking for another deep experience. If a plane is too simple to fly, embedded FSX are the way to go from my point of view. Sure 747 is older but how complex are both ?Do you have any more args to compare both please ? Regards
×
×
  • Create New...