Jump to content

Humberside

Frozen-Inactivity
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    172

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Humberside

  3. Posted

    Hi Maarten,

    I have used simbrief but prefer PFPX as there is more features. The auto-find routes aren't the worse but I would like to strive for as more realism as I can. I'll guess I keep the current setup I have, unless there is another website where i can find RW European routing.

    Thanks

    Joe

  5. Posted

    21 hours ago, downscc said:

    It had a lot of features unique to that product.  The props and turboengine modelling very realistic.  The FMS is a simplified version of a very early FMS before GPS was a thing.  The study sim categorization cannot be used because it doesn't provide for programmable failures, but when a failure occurs the results are faithful to the real thing.  Best of all, RSR flew this thing early in his career and received his personal care and attention to detail.

    I truly hope it finds its way into P3D, my logbook would fill up with JS41 flights alongside my B736 BBJ and the DC-6A.

    Thanks Dan for clarifying 

  9. Posted

    2 hours ago, PMDG777 said:

    Only knew it because I was flying the T7 there and then! KSFO to OMDB across the pole!

    I did the return flight yesterday and I wish I turned it off as it got annoying having to turn it off all the time.

  10. Posted

    Just now, Nick Dobda said:

    Next logical question, wouldn't I have to re-purchase the NGX as well to "try out" the new P3D? Similarly with all my other addons. 

    Yes you would have to rebuy the NGX, even to test, I could be wrong but I'm sure that PMDG doesn't have trial periods. Active sky I'm not sure about as I got it after I got P3D, navigraph wouldn't have to be re-purchased. VATSIM and V-Pilot are free.

    Dynamic lighting I have turned off untill its fixed. I would also say I had a massive increase in performance in P3D compared to FSX. Although I get the same FPS, in P3D the settings are maxed out. In FSX they were quite minimal.l

  11. Posted

    41 minutes ago, Nick Dobda said:

    What bugs and issues? Keep in mind I have FSX-SE, so bugs in P3D I am not aware of. 

    I was in the same boat as you back when P3D V2 was released, I had to rebuy the 737 and T7 and being a younger teenager at the time, £250 (ish) was a fair amount, (upgrading to V3 & V4 was a easier decision) . FSX and the steam version have a fair amount of bugs, any bugs in P3D are because they were there in FSX. The main bug I can think of is where memory would not be dumped so OOMs are easy to get if running a lot of high end addons. As Zuendholz said eye-candy, is actually a smaller part of what LM has done to P3D. Also the major thing with P3D V4 is that it is 64bit appose to FSXs 32bit.

     

    EDIT: Zuendholz I didn't see your response as we where probably typing at the same time

  12. Posted

    12 hours ago, leesteventon said:

    Well, I didn't think there was harm in asking either but some people just can't resist the urge for sarcasm and put downs.

    Personally I don't think anyone was being sarcastic or putting anyone down, just being realistic, and no-one said that it wasn't ok asking for an aircraft to be considered. As Kevin said PMDG know what they are doing years in advance. I said in another forum that it would be great if every aircraft past and present are developed at PMDG standard, however that will never happen, so companies like PMDG have to choose an aircraft that would be successful in term of sales, as even though flight simulation is mainly a hobby, they are like any other company and want to make a profit.

  14. Posted

    1 hour ago, leesteventon said:

    It would be lovely if you could go into business aircraft.

    I would really love a good, PMDG top quality Embraer Phenom 300, Legacy 450 and Legacy 500.

    It would be great if you could consider these for future development.

    although a business jet would be nice. I don't think a business jet would be a commercial success. 

    P.S Full names in the forum

  15. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Michael235 said:

    After watching the Air Baltic videos on YouTube I have fallen in love with the C Series and so I believe have RW pilots.

     

    Michael Jones

    Yes both acft are in RW service along with the MAX but are newer that other acft so data may not be available. 

  16. Posted

    17 minutes ago, Michael235 said:

    So what would stop them from having a relationship with other aircraft companies? Airbus has already said they are willing to license their aircraft to sim developers. The C Series and A350 are new acfts with beautiful electronics. 

    I did say that I could be wrong. If you look at their portfolio they have created only Boeing bar the JS41/BD1900 - The DC6/MD11 could be classed as Boeing. The problem with the A350 and CS are that they are new and data may not be available to them. I think that would stay loyal to Boeing *again I could be wrong*. 

    Also I don't think that Boeing would be to happy with PMDG getting to close to their competitors :cool:

  17. Posted

    21 minutes ago, Michael235 said:

    Would love if they would do the Bombardier C Series or Airbus A350. 

     

    Michael Jones

    PMDG have a great relationship with Boeing so I could be wrong but I doubt they would do a non boeing acft

  18. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Maarten Otto said:

    A decent Jetstream 31/41 would be most welcome....

    They have a 41 for FSX so I think it would be easier for PMDG to get it to P3DV4. I would love the 41 to do some Eastern Airways flights. 

    • Upvote 1

  19. Posted

    5 hours ago, Frank_Kunath said:

    RAR words:

    PMDG 777-300ER Expansion:

    This product requires a Prepar3D v4 hot-fix from Lockheed Martin be released in order to enter testing.

    This product will enter testing within hours of Lockheed Martin publishing the hotfix.

    The current expectation is to release this product during the week of 26JUN, concurrent with Lockheed Martin updating Prepar3D v4.

    When???????

    Technically its the week of 26JUN till Sunday so it not outside the time frame yet. It also says EXPECTATION not it will definitely be released.

  21. Posted

    9 minutes ago, downscc said:

    I just finished a 777 session and had no problem with GSX either.  Make sure it is running by looking for it in the P3D Addon menu.

    It does appear in the addon menu. I know there was a problem in V3 where you had to reinstall the content package, but it isn't this because the 747 is fine (I can't test on other aircraft as they haven't been updated yet)

  24. Posted

    2 minutes ago, downscc said:

    Why did you do that?  You created a problem you did not have.  What about removing items one at a time approach??

    You corrupted the OC with a new install of P3D. Go to the program files(x86)\PMDG Operations Center folder and delete everything but OpsCenterUpdater.exe and then run that.

    I reinstalled everything as every once in a while I reinstall P3D. I thought I would do that now as I had a problem. I did try reinstalling the 737 and 747 but that didn't work. I have done what you said and the OC is working again

    Thanks

  25. Posted

    I have reinstalled P3D and have tried loading the OC and have this error,


    04/01/17 21:12:25     Exception:  Access Violation at 0x0
    00220000  C:\Program Files (x86)\PMDG Operations Center\PMDG Operations Center.exe  +0001220D  (249D68, 2471AC, 233D8C)
    00220000  C:\Program Files (x86)\PMDG Operations Center\PMDG Operations Center.exe  +00015158  (1, 2346F0, 1)
    75D20000  C:\Windows\syswow64\USER32.dll  +000162FA  (3029C, 110, 30292)
    75D20000  C:\Windows\syswow64\USER32.dll  +0003F9BF  (2346F0, 3029C, 110)
    75D20000  C:\Windows\syswow64\USER32.dll  +0003F765  (0, 2346F0, 3029C)
    75D20000  C:\Windows\syswow64\USER32.dll  +0002E744  (B35B30, 0, 110)
    75D20000  C:\Windows\syswow64\USER32.dll  +000162FA  (3029C, 110, 30292)

    I have never seen it before.

×
×
  • Create New...