fenflame

I find the NGX holds up better with FlyInside than native and with a Rift s holds around 25-30 fps with ATW steady at 80. THe issue is if ATW goes lower than 80 all hell breaks loose. Only a loss of 5fps would startit down that path, so I know I am already close to the limit. For those who don't have VR you would need to see about 40-45 fps with a standard monitor to get 20-25 in VR with ATW. So even at 30fps with a standard monitor and getting a great smooth situation , in VR it would be unplayable.

I am 50. I do remember a 'Low' in my school year. Ironically A tall lad given the name. Paul is coming to mind, but I could be way off.

Mine neither. The software is clearly 'debugging' itself !! I came here to get some views if it was worth upgrading from the NGX. I am in VR 100% so with the risk of lower performance I felt it probably would be disappointing given the old NGX is right on the edge in VR for me. Totally off topic. I have lived in the US since 2002, but I come from Ulverston too. From birth to age 33. Went to UVHS, worked at Glaxo for 17 years. Regards, Alan Phillips.

Oh wow, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info guys.

VOR DCS (Dean Cross) in Northern England is not showing on the map at all and the data in the flight plan is completely wrong. It thinks it is 3402823000000000 miles from Glasgow :) . Please could you check. Kind Regards, Alan.