Understood, but MSFS has its own nav data up to date. Is not as it was in FSX, where AIRAC cycle wasn't updated by the sim developer and you necessarily required a subscription. Now, these updates are provided by Microsoft-Asobo.
So I don't see why FSHud requires a Navigraph subscription mandatorily. This is a huge upset.
Regarding my "useless" word, I might have got too far there, but one as a sim pilot wants the controller to provide smooth instructions, taking into account standard departure/arrival procedures, not through vectors.