Hey! :-wave

I have had this plane since it was released, but never really taken it for a true spin, so here it is.....

I hope you lke these shots, I have the whole flight, but had to select 5, so i hope these are good enough to class as the best :-hah

I thought the Grand Canyon would be a nice place to fly this plane...

http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/59834.jpghttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/59836.jpghttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/59840.jpghttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/59842.jpghttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/59843.jpg

Enjoy :-wave

Great shots! I can't wait to get that plane.

Conrad, you should see if FSD wants that VC screenshot! It's better looking than their promo shots and the clarity is terrific. Nice job. The Navajo and Cheyenne fly so smoothe, there's no reason not to grease every landing!

Amazing VC :9 Thanks for showing..:-)

Nice pictures !Pitty they made a "Phanter" with winglets, which close to nobody ever have seen in real life. :-(If they did a "clean" 310 or 325 model, I should purchase it immediately,...but for now,...no purchase by me. ;-)Furthermore, if I dare to give some constructive critisism, without beeing flamed,...those windows have a strange look. To sharp in the corners, and slightly wrong sized.http://www.airliners.net/open.file/417354/L/Staffan AhlbergSweden/Stockholm/ESSAMD-11 Panel Team - Beta testerMy specs are:Dell Dimension 4600 P4/3.0 Ghz512 Mb DDR333 Dual channel memory128 Mb ATI Radeon 9800 ProCatalyst 3.9DirectX 9.0E171FPb Flat panel monitor 17"240Gb (2x120) 7200rpm HD

Awesome Shots!!Bruno Francescoli.

>Pitty they made a "Phanter" with winglets, which close to nobody ever have seen in real life. :-(Huh? Ya got to be kidding:http://www.aircraftdealer.com/aircraft_for..._PA-325/887.htmhttp://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftView.jsp?aircraft_id=78619http://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftView.jsp?aircraft_id=61853

Thanks for the comments guys!My philosophy on this is that FSD make some of the best a/c I fly in flightsim. General aviation a/c's are short in supply at very high quality as it is, and if we strive for perfection and an exact model of an aircraft, then it will never happen, because we will always expect better - After all, it is only a sim.Just my two centshttp://www.fsd-international.com/dc/images/twocents.gifThanks for the comments, and im glad you like!

>>Pitty they made a "Phanter" with winglets, which close to>nobody ever have seen in real life. :-(>>>Huh? Ya got to be kidding:>>http://www.aircraftdealer.com/aircraft_for..._PA-325/887.htm>>http://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftView.jsp?aircraft_id=78619>>http://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftView.jsp?aircraft_id=61853Ok then.....So if we compare the percentage of "Panthers" with "clean" Navajos, how common are the Panthers? If you are uncertain, just take a quick brouse at Airliners.net,....;-)And I did say "close to nobody". not that they didn

>Thanks for the comments guys!>>My philosophy on this is that FSD make some of the best a/c I>fly in flightsim. General aviation a/c's are short in supply>at very high quality as it is, and if we strive for perfection>and an exact model of an aircraft, then it will never happen,>because we will always expect better - After all, it is only a>sim.>>Just my two centsHi,Well I agree somewhat.However, FSD

Nice shots. :)

Thanks once again for the comments :-hahI do agree that the Porter was of a slightly better exterior quality, although I think that the interiour lacked slightly. This Navajo is exactly the opposite...Its great on the inside, and just good on the outside.I think that if enough people were to put down their names to say that they wanted a clean Naajo, and would guarentee a purchase, then FSD would make one. So if you would like to put this to FSD then I will be willing to act as an 'ambassador' :-lolPlease leave your name and a contact method and I will let you know what they say.

>which close to nobody ever have seen in real life.I've never seen a Cheyenne 400 LS but I have seen a Panther and fly regularly (business to remote communities) in a Chieftain. Does that mean they shouldn't make a Cheyenne LS but hey they should make a Chieftain. How many of us have seen the Avanti craft that they are modeling? I'll probably never see one in real life. It's not a criticism that certain of us haven't see such and such craft. The issue is whether they do a good job in its modeling. No one can question the fact they have done a wonderful job on this plane (as they do on all their planes).But to each their own.:)

Hi,I have noticed your remarks, and also that you didn

Great shots :D