Does anyone know why someone can not make a new KLAX (Los Angeles) airport for FS2004 that will work with Aerosoft's AES (Airport Enhancement Servces) ? Just about every MAJOR will work with it except, KLAX ?? jerrycwo4

According to the AES forum, both DCA and LAX need some updates from their maker for AES to be able to work. It seems it has been in that status for a while possibly meaning Cloud 9 isn't cooperating or possibly doesn't care.RegardsRichie

Yes, in my view we are not going to have Cloud9 LAX AESed. Unfortunately so, since this is a very nice scenery, especially combined with G.Razek's photoreal LA area addon packs. We would rather wait for someone to make a new pro LAX though I see no-one on the horizon at the moment.I do hope I'm wrong.Best regards

Is it because Cloud9 KLAX has its own active gate, (not ActiGate.dll), stuff? I think that's the other part of BGLMAN.dll. One part is a forced piracy prevention system and the other part is their "Active Gate" stuff (I think). Personally, I wish they'd separate the 2 systems and provide an update. I don't use the Cloud9 "Active Gate" stuff and yet am forced to carry it around like excess garbage :) Love the airport, really dislike the Cloud9 system...wish I could get rid of it. Aerosoft, if you're listening out there...Please redo KLAX for uuuussss!Mark

Is it because Cloud9 KLAX has its own active gate, (not ActiGate.dll), stuff? I think that's the other part of BGLMAN.dll. One part is a forced piracy prevention system and the other part is their "Active Gate" stuff (I think). Personally, I wish they'd separate the 2 systems and provide an update. I don't use the Cloud9 "Active Gate" stuff and yet am forced to carry it around like excess garbage :) Love the airport, really dislike the Cloud9 system...wish I could get rid of it. Aerosoft, if you're listening out there...Please redo KLAX for uuuussss!Mark

But.. So does the Cloud9 EHAM scenery and that is AES compatible.

Humm...I wonder if that you're using a later version of EHAM? KLAX went to version 1.01 and then nothing after while EHAM is now at version 1.04. Could be that they did take it out in the more recent versions of their software, or, their software now checks if AES is installed and disables its version of Active Gate? Kind of sounds right but I don't know.Mark

Thanks for the replys. I with someone would make it then my West Coast flights could be complete. I guess I'll have to fly the East coast for awhile. Thanks jerrycwo4 Maybe I'll try the demo of Cloud 9's KLAX.

Jerry, You are using San Francisco, San Diego and San Jose (lol, all saints?) with AES support?Add Seattle, Portland and Las Vegas and it makes quite a lot of West Coast flying, doesn't it?Best regards

Jerry, You are using San Francisco, San Diego and San Jose (lol, all saints?) with AES support?Add Seattle, Portland and Las Vegas and it makes quite a lot of West Coast flying, doesn't it?Best regards

I do have airports with AES on the West Coast:KSEA, KPDX, KSFO and KSAN. I'm going to get Las Vegas next. What's missing...... KLAX. I just bought Cloud 9's KLAX and it is a beautiful airport! It has more moving cars, buses and trucks than any other airport that I have. I know that it is NOT AES, but it will have to do for the time being. It is unbelivable at night! Their gate system really sucks ( compared to a AES airport gates) but the rest of the airport is top of the line. As in all, of the updated airports made to work with AES I get about 8-12 FPS (at the gate) on my 3 - 26" monitors system. This really sucks but I love the AES system so much that I'm willing to put up with it. As soon as I get away from the gate my FPS goes up to mid teens whic is OK and I fly in the VC mode at 25-35 FPS. jerrycwo4