July 5, 201015 yr Author Really interesting discussion so far guys.I am a little surprised for the very low rating got by PSS Airbus. Right, it is an old addon but what I heard about is a good FMC, probably the best compared with the other stuffs. Any of us know huge lacks of Airsimmer and Wilco FMC (for this reason Eric Marciano launched his patch, not properly cheap in my opinion) and their incorrect behaviour to follow the correct vertical path, impossibility to draw fuel, time and other predictions, second route management and other. I think it is one of most important aspect to consider.So maybe the PSS Airbus don't simulate (or don't simulate well) the fly-by-wire technology (meant as bank angle, stall and overspeed protection) or the Airbus typical flying methodology by the stick? I heard somewhere that PSS Airbus are flown as a normal boeing, which is in reality not correct.Thanks bye.RR Capt. RICCARDO RIGHETTIProud customer of the PMDG 737NGX and PMDG 777X (wating for next... PMDG 747 v2 - Queen of Skies) --- Follow me on my Website and Flickr
July 5, 201015 yr Author [...] it fails at its most basic requirement - flying a vertical profile.Think that Mack hit the point, I don't know whether the Marciano's patch has fixed the problem. Furthermore, consider also some important lacks in MCDU.Last one, I tried Wilco at my friend's home and I noticed a very high fps drop compared with other payware addons. Capt. RICCARDO RIGHETTIProud customer of the PMDG 737NGX and PMDG 777X (wating for next... PMDG 747 v2 - Queen of Skies) --- Follow me on my Website and Flickr
Create an account or sign in to comment