DLC ?Gran Canyon, Alaska, Krakatoa, Toronto and Niagara Falls.Planes ?Lockheed SR71, MC Donnell Douglas F4 Phantom, Cessna Crusader.-

Edited February 11, 201214 yr by Mark II

I wonder what exact process they follow to develop scenery? For example, if they were to model a municipal airfield in Washington State, would they employ onsite photography?

Hi all,Sorry i am dutch but why the downd use something like Google Earth or Virtual maps...And make it lets say 10 dollar /euro per month with world covery. So we can fly everyware we want, downt you think. With a program like tileproxy....Gr Arnold

Edited February 11, 201214 yr by arnoldnl

I don't know about the NEXT DLC, but I suspect soon we will see some form of "FUN" Jet Airline.Followed by a nice BIG airport to park it in.OH yes, FLIGHT is going to be a FUN game to play, especailly for those that want to fly from OUTSIDE the cockpit.

Edited February 11, 201214 yr by FSMP

I would vote for a 172 too, curious to see much improvement they have gotten over FSX.

I'm hoping they avoid any/most of the planes in FSX and go with something different just for variety. . .

Next area will be Alaska, and next aircraft a helicopter and a small jet.

Hm, the Pacific NorthWest seems like a good choice, but that terrain is already covered by several 3rd party FSX producers, as well as Take On Helicopters. I wonder if they'd prefer something that hasn't been covered so many times.. but then again, they did start with Hawaii. I think Scotland/Edinborough, or some Italian, French, or Italian coast options would be neat. But if the majority of their expected audience is in NA they might stay closer to home.