Why is FS2004 called "FS9"? Shouldn't it really be FS10? I've got the boxes back to FS5 and when I counted, I found that it should be 10. just wondering.

Hi There,How are you counting 5a?5a is not FS6.FS1998 is FS6FS2000 is FS7FS2002 is FS8FS2004 is FS9Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/as2004proudsupporter.jpg

So, what was FS95 (Flight Simulator for Windows95)? R-

FSW95 is 6.0FS98 is 6.1For a complete timeline:http://simflight.com/~fshistory/fsh/timeline.htmHope this helps,JimActiveSky Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/as2004proudsupporter.jpg

Wow, that's right; this is like a history quiz. And now that I think about it, after 5.0a, there came 5.1. (Oh, I just noticed the timeline link. Never mind.) R-

good question, though...R

I was counting 5, 95(6), 98(7), 2000(8), 2002(9), 2004(10). oh well. so 95 was 5a?

98 is 6.1.Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/as2004proudsupporter.jpg

By what I'm reading, we should have a BRAND NEW FS 2006 in 2005. Correct?

There was a 5.1 version ...... sooooo ... 4, 5, 5.1, 6 ..>Why is FS2004 called "FS9"? Shouldn't it really be FS10? I've>got the boxes back to FS5 and when I counted, I found that it>should be 10. just wondering.

There's a rumor that M$ might not make another one. They basically said "no comment". Don't know tho. (I hate spreading rumors....)How is HTML supposed to work. It says it's enabled but obviously it doesn't work for me. Ah, I see. They screwed it up by using [ ]. */me shakes head* extrememly strange. I used brackets there][, but they turned out to be greater than and less thans!

Shouldn't FS9 be FS8.1 then :-lol-Daniel

No because it's a comepletely new FS, I guess.