Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

nolonger

Re The "what's going on here" topic

Recommended Posts

I too have found that Dx9 performs much better than it did following the use of the Dx10 fixer.

I have found as well, that even without the two "Multisamples" entries in the fsx.cfg file, Dx10 is perfectly well antialiased.

I am able to swap between modes by doing no more than changing DX10=1 to =0.

 

The difference I can detect is that a typical scene, for example the one pictured below,

in Dx9 consumes 2,040,824 kb of VAS, whereas in Dx10, it consumes 1,858,580.

 

These are my settings in NI, I do not change them between Dx9 and 10.

(I do not use the default MS Flightsimulator X profile, rather the Base profile amended only as shown, saved as MS FSX and linked to Fsx.exe) 

 

if5q.jpg

Dx10

zgux.jpg

 

Dx9

8jl1.jpg

 

I also have no idea why and am simply pleased that it has happened.

 

Regards,

Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Hmm? Why didn't you post a reply on the other topic and instead started a new one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you ask, because the other topic has moved on to another possible side effect/benefit and I did not wish to interrupt.

 

Regards,

Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites