April 19, 201412 yr I have been flying the feelthere Phenom for a while and it is superb both in flight and fps. However, the FMS does now allow for the manual insertion of waypoints (broken under p3d ?). And its interior night lightintg is insufficient. Is the Carenado as smooth in fps as the feelthere? Anyone know of any obvious differences in the two under P3DV22 ? allen
April 19, 201412 yr Anyone know of any obvious differences in the two under P3DV22 One of them as very well modeled systems including FLC VNAC CSC mode, a working takeoff config button ect. Both are based off the default GPS dressed up as a G1000 Systems = Feelthere Pretty = Carenado wins here. Depends on what your needs are from a simulation.
April 19, 201412 yr Author Depends on what your needs are from a simulation. I dont need obscure systems simulated. And the manual for feelthere does not feel all there. I do need good fluid fps which the feelthere has. I also need a functioning FMS of which feelthere has limitations in P3Dv22
Create an account or sign in to comment