Aerobask Epic Victory Released

[ryanbatc 12,857]

Yeah I think it's too twitchy as well- I'll have to try the joystick tweak

[Anxu00 176]

I'm surprised there's not much interest in this plane.  Is it the scary glass? 

Certainly not.  I had not picked up any Aerobask because the previous planes did not appeal to my flying preferences.  This one does.  I always like small jet and fast prop.  The Lancair Legacy FG looks strange a bit compared to what I am used to with the P3D version from RealAir, so I did not pick it up from Aerobask.  In addition, the Epic Victory has more systems simulated than the basics with others.  Aerobask has come a long way.

I suppose people just want MOAR Boeings and Airbuses.... boring boring boring!

Because many want to be airliner pilots, I suppose.  For me I just don't see the appeal of being in the flight deck for hours on end.  I am the short less than 3 hrs flight type, short and sweet. I did a 777 cross Atlantic flight once after 7 hours, I am just glad I am at home doing something else while the AP does its job .  Btw, I suppose the systems modeled here by Aerobask are better than the Carenado variety? 

[chiropra 0]

hello

 i love this aircraft ! but, but i have 2 problems !

first after having programing  vor 1 and vor 2 in nav 1 and nav 2, with CRS, let says  I have NAV1 active. how to make active NAV2 ? and disengage NAV1 ?

second / landing is ok but controling the after landing and using the brakes is quite a challenge ! any idea ?

ty!

jj