Anxu00

Thank you Andras for all your work. I for one would not have used XP10 and now XP11 without your mesh. Best of luck in your future endeavor.

Interesting, what's MCX, I would like to do the same. Thx

Isn't that Weather Connector app from XAviation for? To smooth transition?

Nice shots, the HDMesh is as good as Ortho4XP from what I can see. Saving my money for the TBM900. I was thinking about the Carenado PC-12 but told myself to forget about it, once the news came out

At least Ses is right in the purchase department for me. I only buy stuffs for XP11 these days. ORBX in P3D has reached the point of good enough and also enough. XP11 on the other hands is new market, plus I don't have to deal with the annoying micro stutters.

What mod was that?I thought PBR would be enough. Saving my money for the TBM900 but nice shots.

Would be nice to have this one redone for the 310 REDUX version. Master Ron?

Indeed. I followed the core sim developer Totoritko, but I did not know that the 3D model is worked on by LES. Outstanding!

No emails for me either, and I am in the same time zone and geo as MilViz! May be they sent them via old fashion "snail" mail ?

Still not available for sale yet! The page is still "coming soon"

Thanks for the review Ryan. How's dynamic light performance in P3D V4.x ? Is it configurable off as an option for those who do not have the monster HW?

Very nice

In a Sim, this choice by Carenado does not matter that much as people uses the pop-up anyway. In real life (and if you want to imagine flying the real aircraft) this location choice is drop dead stupid and useless, the whole point about the unit is that it has to be in front you to fly with duh. I fly the C90GTX with Bert's GTN mod,a much better combo. To me this so called "GTN integration" is once again an insult to simmer.

Same here. In my opinion, DL is a feature that should be optional for add-on maker, just as LM made it an option. If PMDG would have that option, I bet there are way more people happy. Airliners are already complex and demanding beast, and to be honest, unless you are light artist, I don't see a real advantage requiring me to give up so much performance for dubious eye candy. Not everyone can afford to keep up with the HW escalating cost, so not having a choice to use lower eye candy but higher performance is bad. Why do I have to fly the tube only in day time or lower setting at night, where with other aircraft I don't have to? Until then, my expensive PMDG birds stay in the Nevada desert.

Me three. Thx Many thanks Bert, now I can cease using P3Dv3.4 only for the RV-7 due to the missing cockpit sounds.