Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,011 Excellent

About Dillon

  • Rank
    Member - 5,000+
  • Birthday 08/03/1972

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Orlando, Fl

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Recent Profile Visitors

26,286 profile views
  1. FYI, after SU13 it looks like the upgraded Longitude Avionics that we have the option to download is getting more and more taxing on system resources (stuttering, pauses, etc). I've since uninstalled it and use the default avionics suite. Don't have any official spec numbers to compare, just gave up and went back to what works. Just making you aware if the issue proves to be outside of my isolated experience.
  2. Hopefully the interior of the plane as well as opening doors is on the list.๐Ÿ™ The trend of none-opening doors on Asobo aircraft I hope get's corrected. Thanks for the feedback.๐Ÿบ
  3. It always sucks when the sim was running fine before an update and after you have to adjust settings to get the sim to perform as it did before. I had to lower a couple settings as well to get the sim to run as good as it did pre SU13. At least visually the sim still looks good even with lower graphic settings, not even noticeable the change.๐Ÿ˜
  4. The powerlines mod still causes issues (at least on my end) but Solar Farms is not that bad. I removed everything but the factories mod.
  5. Anyone notice any difference with water waves and ship wakes? Maybe it was the calm weather off the Keys but it looks like water wave simulation has decreased and the wake effect behind ships has been altered to where their barley visible.๐Ÿ˜•
  6. Where can I get this livery? Not seeing it on Flightsim.to.
  7. I shouldn't have included San Diego in this list as LTVR has taken care of downtown with their KSAN scenery. We can replace San Diego's downtown area on my list above with Houston. That city could use the SamScene treatment.
  8. My squadron VAQ-34 was an aggressor squadron with avionics simulating Russian fighters. We had pods but weren't accompanied by other fighters nor did we carry live missiles. We had drills simulating attacks on fleet carrier groups and Red Flag operations. VAQ-34 played the role of simulating what NATO would face in a full air war. We had lot A and B F/A-18's out of NAS Lemoore back in 1993. The squadron has since been decommissioned.
  9. For anyone that likes Naval aviation I highly recommend this one. The developer behind this is Miltech and it's sold on Orbix. The reason I mention JayShrike is because many of the features that were in that freeware package are modified, upgraded, and expanded upon in the payware version. Another thing that is suspect to me is all the locations I told JayShrike to consider for accurate Naval options made it exactly into the Supercarrier Pro offering (every one๐Ÿ˜ณ). I'm prior Navy (VAQ-34, VFA-94) and know a little something about areas training operation occur from time to time, I told them to place carrier's in Washington, west of San Diego, some not far off the coast of Florida in the Pan Handle/Key West more in the gulf instead of off of Key Largo, Texas, etc. All this among other areas around the world found it's way into this payware offering, I was surprised to say the least. If any of the team ever reads this, thank you.๐Ÿบ I will say this, there are no carrier operations in the bay of San Diego but the carrier looks nice just the same.๐Ÿบ As ex-Navy I highly recommend this. Go see the YouTube reviews to get a preview of the features this add-on offers. ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘ Now if only I can get ride of that LSO overlay everytime I activate the arrester cables with the included Carrier Pro software (it's blocks the forward view in VR).๐Ÿฅบ It only happens with the Asobo F/A-18. I just want to use the Supercarrier Pro software. It must be a part of the freeware mod I installed as a companion to the JayShrike mod. ๐Ÿ™
  10. Adding to this how's the beta looking so far? Are you seeing meaningful improvements?
  11. With so many options in cities to do I hate when developers do the same areas. Leave places like Seattle, Chicago, Miami alone and do areas no other developer has touched with any level of high detail. Cities like Atlanta (they could do a better job than ATDSIM), Orlando, Tampa, Dallas, Minneapolis, and San Diego to name a few would be far better options to do with no conflicts with other scenery.
  12. All I can say is, 'Wow'. ๐Ÿบ With returns like these we are going to see some amazing add-ons in the not so distant future. Gulfstream might even get off there high horse and let us model a study level G650ER at some point.๐Ÿ˜
  13. I haven't had a problem using it with the Longitude...๐Ÿ˜ถ FSR/Longitude combination is what I've used for over a year now. Wouldn't have it any other way.๐Ÿบ
  14. Dominic Design seems to be the better of the two. It's the one I bought.๐Ÿบ
  • Create New...