February 17, 20188 yr Would it be possible for any of the beta testers to tell us how performance compares to PMDG NG/777 A simple load at the same airport under the same setting will quickly show is FPS are better-same-lower It would be very helpful if someone could report. The amount of FPS is no so interesting as the comparison of better-same-lower. Since most flight simmers have the NG it would be nice to know what we can expect. If it is lower the percentage would be helpful. Also are the FPS consistent like the PMDG's or fluctuate like the FSL A320. Thank you. David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
February 17, 20188 yr Commercial Member A very generic observation in the exact same place, on ground at the gate, with an average scenery and AS running. Maddog X: 43 pretty steady (42-45) PMDG 737: 40-47 fluctuating PMDG 777: 42-46 fluctuating PMDG 747: fluctuating around 40 FSLabs: fluctuating 25-34 I think it can be considered generally in line with all the above add-ons in terms of performance demand; just by my observation it seems to be the one with steadier figures (it if means anything at all). Hope this helps. Regards Michele Galmozzi
February 17, 20188 yr Here's also a Youtube vid of one of the beta testers with the maddog. Look pretty smooth to me. Dylan Charles "The aircraft G-limits are only there in case there is another flight by that particular airplane. If subsequent flights do not appear likely, there are no G-limits."
February 17, 20188 yr Author 6 hours ago, Meekg said: A very generic observation in the exact same place, on ground at the gate, with an average scenery and AS running. Maddog X: 43 pretty steady (42-45) PMDG 737: 40-47 fluctuating PMDG 777: 42-46 fluctuating PMDG 747: fluctuating around 40 FSLabs: fluctuating 25-34 I think it can be considered generally in line with all the above add-ons in terms of performance demand; just by my observation it seems to be the one with steadier figures (it if means anything at all). Hope this helps. Regards Thank you so much. When I have done my own FPS with the 737-777-747, just like you I find the NG-777 the same the 747 lower and FSL as you have put. So the MadDog sounds really stable and great performance. Looking forward to it even more now. Thanks again for your reply. David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.