Most of the serious simmers have no use for the default FS aircraft so it won't matter to me.I would like to see fewer aircraft and them done more accurate.

>http://www.flightsim.com/cgi/kds?$=main/notams06/fsx0104.htm>>Half way down, next to the ultalight picture - >>"You can see from the screen shots that we are going to get>some exciting new aircraft in FSX. The Grumman Goose and>DeHavilland Beaver look especially tantalizing. Other new>aircraft include DG sailplanes, ultralights, and the Airbus>A321. The Boeing 737 has been upgraded to the model>800.">>I rest my case :(Good reference but if you look carefully the section regarding what aircraft to expect in FSX is lead off with this:FlightSim.Com analysis, commentary and expert punditry about FSX.First of all, let me assure you that we do not have any insider scoop on FSX. If we did, we probably could not publish it because we only publish the facts that have been checked and confirmed by Microsoft or other reliable independent sources. After all, we have been told repeatedly by our flightsimmer friends that you all prefer accurate reporting to tabloid sensationalism. No two-headed geeks, alien abductions or Elvis sightings here. What follows is the collected wisdom of this writer plus the rest of the FlightSim.Com editorial team as opposed to the rumors, gossip and myths you may encounter in other media.