I don't understand the frustrations with FSX

>A lot of people don't realise that some of the tweaks for FSX>can actually double your framerate without ANY difference>being made to the quality of the graphics.>>Hard to believe, but there are certain tweaks that will amaze>you with how much performance you can squeeze out of the sim,>whilst maintaining the same graphics settings and quality,>except for maybe the autogen.>>One example is the autogen tweak, which allows you to control>the maximum number of trees per cell, but won't affect autogen>much overall. What I mean to say is that general tree areas>aren't affected by the tweak, only the densely forrested areas>are. In general reducing that setting will only affect those>areas but tree autogen in the sim still looks much more real.>>You'll be surprised how much you can get out of the sim and>how well it can perform despite looking a thousand times>better than FS9. The thread with the comparison shots I just>posted below will convince you.>>JamesJames, when you say you get average 20fps. What are your minimums and maximums and are you a bush flyer or an airline type. I'm wondering what your system performance is like in built up areas, flying an airliner, rather than a less demanding (on the system) light GA? Finally, do you use high quality addons like PMDG, LDS etc and maybe high quality airport addons and if so what do you anticipate your FPs wold be like once you add those into FSX? Sorry to ask you all these questions but I think they are relevant to the FSX performance question.