April 22, 20224 yr Moderator On 4/17/2022 at 8:37 AM, aescal said: I tend to use Plan-G alot. Little Nav Map is good but it looks very cluttered.. Just like PlanG it depends on your settings. Try reducing the detail, etc. PlanG is a mess also with all bells and whistles enabled RIG#1 - I9 14900K MSI Pro z790 RTX 5070Ti 40" 4K Monitor 3840x2160
May 8, 20224 yr I suffered with that too a bit until I spend some time playing around with the huge amount of settings in LittleNavMap. After that I am even more happy with LNM. I love for most the multiple export of flight plans. I often do not yet know what plane I am gonna use if I plan a route. So I standard save it in 6 formats without the hassle of finding the correct directory and format for every plane or sim (I use XPlane and p3d) Only thing I would like to see is that it could generate a simbrief compatible document because some planes and software have possibilities to import that. But it is not a real 'problem' . The advantage is, it uses the nav databases from the sim. That is also sort of a limitation. I can use sids ,stars and approaches for XPlane that match the database of the aircraft. But in p3d I only see approaches, there are no sids/starts and I do not know if this is a p3d limitation (I mostly fly vor-vor in vintage pre-glass-cockpit airliners without FMS/FMC so I do not miss it) or it is LNM. If LNM was payware I would buy it. It is brilliant, as far as I experience, it is as good as bug-free, loaded with possibilities and relative easy to use. (I found out about the (great) online manual only after a year or so, because i never really needed it before) It has a logbook, does flight tracking, fuel-planning, works off-line, is super flexible regarding parameters like coordinate-formats, weight etc. Gives weather reports (using the sims data) But also info about the airports like frequencies, elevation, runways, navigation data etc
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.