Thanks Mike. Good point.

>Hi,>>"this is a flaw of the FSX display engine" >>The display engine isn't the culprit, but the Land/Water mask>data for that area is. And, yes, you should let Aces know as>they may wish to include such corrections in the first update.>We can only hope that will be the case, but I think it more>likely that such ammendments may be deferred until the>forthcoming 'Performance' update is out of the way.>>MikeThis is indeed a data issue. We used to keep the shorelines as discrete polylines and had problems where there would be gaps between the water and the shoreline. For FSX we derive the shoreline from the water polygons (at export time). In some places (this is one of them) we had some data problems that were not discovered until too late. Please file a bug (www.fsinsider.com).No promises, but I believe the coastlines in the area from the OP will get some SP1 love. (PLEASE don't ask - I cannot post the plan, and the list of things we are trying to accomplish is final.)-Doug